Skip to content
Subscribe

The Quest for the Perfect Candidate Conundrum

Published:

Too many Americans are not engaged in the political process. There are a variety of reasons why, but I think the largest is that they don’t like their choices of candidates. All too often, it is a matter of choosing “the lesser of two evils.”

We all have this idea of a perfect candidate that will come out of the shadows and save our country. Someone we can proudly support that hasn’t done anything wrong in their life and has made all the right moves. Their 2.1 children are perfect and well behaved. We will be able to count on them to not make any mistakes or saying anything foolish. They have years of experience building consensus with disparate parties. They have left every place better than they found it. They will vote exactly like we want on every bill and have perfect judgement and omnipotent wisdom to find the right solution. They are independently wealthy from some altruistic profession that allows them to bypass the need to even speak with special interests.

When that person comes along -- THAT is when we will get involved in politics.

First, that person doesn’t exist. If they did, they wouldn’t be the perfect candidate for the person within 100 feet of you -- much less the entire country.

Second, if they DID exist, would the perfect candidate want to even get involved in the current mess? All they see is the bickering of two parties that are trying to convince the country of how evil the other party is. Furthermore, is the public doing anything about this? Who are they electing? After all, the public has the power to define the system and choose the people they want, right?

I suspect the perfect candidate is watching us -- the voters. Because of their success and stature, they have much to lose. He or she is paying attention to how we are behaving and who we are supporting -- and how vocal we are about it.

OR perhaps we are silent. Completely silent. Letting the people with the biggest bullhorn choose for us. Right now, they are hesitant. They see voters choosing partisan candidates that are beholden to one of two political parties. They don’t see a willingness of voters to break away from the political duopoly we have. If YOU were the perfect candidate, would YOU run for office? Have the voters shown they are choosing reasonable people – supporting them, both financially and MOST importantly, being vocal about it.

The perfect candidate is probably a savvy businessperson. They are looking for market interest in the “product.” We have shown them limited willingness to “buy” a less partisan candidate -- so why would they go about trying to sell one? Instead, they are diligently working on their business, or organization while spending the appropriate time with their loved ones. They are having reasonable conversations with their peers about real problems they face and finding common sense solutions.

Often times, their progress is measured in incremental chunks. Working each day toward improving whatever project(s) they are on. They have a vision of what they would like to achieve, but realize reality might alter their course. They know progress is incremental.

So we keep waiting on the sidelines. Waiting. Perhaps the perfect candidate will make their first mistake and decide to run in the current system. OR, we could start making little changes bit by bit and help create the proper environment -- one that doesn’t need the perfect candidate to come along and save us.

Photo Credit: goldyg / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The Quest for the Perfect Candidate Conundrum

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us