Who Will Move First on Cannabis Tax Relief — Newsom or Trump?

Trump-Newsom-Cannabis
Image generated by IVN staff.
Cara Brown McCormickCara Brown McCormick
Published: 08 Sep, 2025
3 min read

The political rivalry between President Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom has dominated headlines this year, most recently over the issue of congressional redistricting, also known as gerrymandering. 

But there is another issue where both leaders could soon leave their mark: cannabis tax relief. Each is in a position to give the struggling legal cannabis industry a financial lifeline while putting new pressure on the illicit market and cartels.

The question is whether either will act, and who might do it first.

In Sacramento, AB 564 has been moving quickly. The Assembly approved it 74 to 0 on June 2 to roll back the automatic increase in the state’s 15% cannabis excise tax, which jumped to 19% in July. The bill cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee last week and must pass the full Legislature by September 12.

Governor Newsom would then have until October 12 to sign it into law, and he has already stated his intention to do so.

Supporters argue that the tax relief is crucial for an industry that is struggling under high costs and intense competition from the illicit market. Assemblymember Matt Haney of San Francisco, the bill’s author, warned that piling more costs on legal businesses risks pushing them out of the market altogether. 

Regulators have also acknowledged that high taxes keep the illicit market dominant. 

The black market is very pervasive, and it is definitely larger than the legal market,” said Bill Jones, head of enforcement for the Department of Cannabis Control.

President Trump signaled two weeks ago that he may reclassify cannabis under federal law, something no president has been able to do in more than half a century.

IVP Donate

Since 1971, cannabis has been treated as a Schedule I substance, grouped with heroin and considered more dangerous than fentanyl or cocaine. That status not only restricts research but also subjects licensed businesses to IRS code 280E, which denies legal cannabis businesses ordinary business deductions and inflates their tax burdens.

Most observers expect Trump to keep his campaign promise to move cannabis to Schedule III, which would eliminate the 280E penalty and provide immediate financial relief. 

But there are also signs that Schedule II is still under consideration. Such a move would recognize medical value but keep 280E in place, leaving operators in largely the same bind. 

In August, Trump said his administration would make a determination “over the next few weeks,” describing the issue as complicated. His nominee to lead the DEA, Terrance Cole, initially described rescheduling as a priority during his confirmation hearing, but later declined to commit to timing.

For the legal cannabis industry, the stakes are enormous. Governor Newsom has the opportunity to freeze a state tax hike that has already increased costs, while President Trump could reshape the federal tax and regulatory landscape overnight. Both are already locked in a broader political clash. Cannabis tax relief for legal operators offers each a chance to appeal to a large constituency of voters and business interests that cut across party lines.

As lawmakers, regulators, and industry leaders wait, one question hangs over the debate: Will relief come first from Sacramento or from Washington?

You Might Also Like

Fox News channel
Fox News And Its Very Dishonest Cannabis DUI Story
A recent Fox News segment about 106 drivers with THC in their systems who died in car crashes shows how media networks package limited research findings into sensationalized news that seeks to influence political debate. At a key moment when President Donald J. Trump is weighing a decision to use his executive power to reschedule cannabis and combat illegal drug cartels, the network's reporting on a Wright State University study about THC and traffic fatalities scares viewers by misrepresenting the scope and key findings. ...
10 Oct, 2025
-
8 min read
Cannabis and Trump
Trump Shares Pro-Cannabis Video From Longtime Friend, Heightening Suspense Over Cannabis Rescheduling
On September 28, President Donald Trump posted a Truth Social video praising CBD as a “game-changer” for seniors....
30 Sep, 2025
-
4 min read
California Cuts Cannabis Taxes as DEA Targets Vapes and Congress Tries to Block Rescheduling
California Cuts Cannabis Taxes as DEA Targets Vapes and Congress Tries to Block Rescheduling
The landscape for cannabis in the United States continues to shift on multiple fronts, with recent developments spanning state tax relief, federal enforcement, and congressional roadblocks to reform....
26 Sep, 2025
-
5 min read
broken california map
EXCLUSIVE: California Commissioner Says Lawmakers Gutted Their Funding BEFORE Prop 50
The fate of California’s independently drawn congressional districts will be decided on November 4, when voters weigh in on a legislative gerrymander and the suspension of congressional maps from the state's independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC) under Proposition 50....
08 Oct, 2025
-
8 min read
fl-let-us-vote
Poll Shows Overwhelming Support for Opening Florida’s Primaries to 3.4M Independent Voters
A new statewide poll finds near-unanimous agreement among both Democratic and independent voters that Florida’s primaries should be opened to the state’s 3.4 million “No Party Affiliation” (NPA) voters who are currently shut out of taxpayer-funded elections....
10 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read