Skip to content
Subscribe

Hemp-Derived THC Ban Passes US Senate

Nearly all hemp-derived THC products in the United States are set to become illegal in late 2026 under new legislation passed by the U.S. Senate. The measure, included within a series of government funding bills, changes the federal definition of hemp and effectively outlaws the wide range of intoxi

Hemp-Derived THC Ban Passes US Senate
Photo by Elsa Olofsson on Unsplash.
Published:

Nearly all hemp-derived THC products in the United States are set to become illegal in late 2026 under new legislation passed by the U.S. Senate. The measure, included within a series of government funding bills, changes the federal definition of hemp and effectively outlaws the wide range of intoxicating hemp items that have spread across the country since the 2018 Farm Bill.

The bill passed on November 10 by a 60-40 vote, despite an effort by Kentucky Senator Rand Paul to block it. Paul, a long-time advocate for hemp farmers, argued that the legislation would devastate the entire industry.

Paul said on the Senate floor that the bill “makes the hemp industry kaput.” The new limits “will eliminate 100% of the hemp products in our country,” he said. “Every plant in the country will have to be destroyed.”

The new language now moves to the House of Representatives, where Speaker Mike Johnson suggested a vote could happen as soon as November 12. The measure also has the backing of President Donald Trump, according to a White House official who confirmed the administration’s support for the hemp ban.

If enacted, the law would take effect one year after it is signed and would eliminate the legal protections currently provided under the 2018 Farm Bill. It would replace the existing hemp definition with a narrower one, allowing only products that contain no more than 0.3 percent total tetrahydrocannabinols, including both THC and its acidic form, THCA. That change would close the “THCA loophole,” which some companies have used to sell hemp flower and other products with intoxicating effects outside of marijuana regulations.

In addition, the new definition would exclude any cannabinoid that cannot be naturally produced by the cannabis plant or that has been synthesized outside of it. This means that hemp-derived compounds such as HHC and THC P, both of which are popular in edibles and vapes, would no longer qualify as legal hemp products.

Legal experts warn that the implications could be far-reaching. The potential fallout would reach from small businesses to major retailers that currently sell hemp-based beverages and other products. Stores such as Total Wine & Spirits, Circle K, and Target have recently expanded their offerings to include hemp-infused goods, which could all be removed from shelves under the new definition.

The push to tighten hemp regulations has been building for months. The U.S. Hemp Roundtable, an industry advocacy group, estimates that hemp-derived THC has become a $28.4 billion market employing hundreds of thousands of workers. Yet it has also drawn sharp criticism from the regulated marijuana sector and other industries that see it as unfair competition.

During the fall, the effort to close the loophole gained momentum. Maryland Congressman Andy Harris and Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell were among the most vocal supporters. In October, 39 state attorneys general urged Congress to act, citing the need for clearer rules.

In recent weeks, lobbying pressure intensified as alcohol and cannabis industry groups joined the call for reform. The alcohol sector, which once saw hemp beverages as a growth opportunity, has shifted to support the ban. Ironically, this move is expected to hurt smaller brewers that embraced hemp THC drinks to attract new customers.

The regulated marijuana industry welcomed the Senate’s action. Hemp advocates, meanwhile, expressed outrage at how the provision was inserted into the funding package.

If approved by the House and signed into law, the change would override state-level rules that currently permit hemp-derived THC products. It would also mark a sharp reversal from the more permissive stance established under the 2018 Farm Bill.

For supporters of the ban, the change is about restoring clarity and consistency to cannabis law. For opponents, it’s a reminder that industries built on legislative gray areas rarely stay safe for long.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Hemp-Derived THC Ban Passes US Senate

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us