SoccerCity's Effort To Force SDSU West Off The Ballot Fails In Court

SoccerCity's Effort To Force SDSU West Off The Ballot Fails In Court
Published: 15 Jun, 2018
2 min read

Superior Court Judge Joel Wohlfeil denied FS Investors request to remove the SDSU West initiative from the ballot, confirming his tentative ruling.

Judge Wohlfeil noted he was, "not persuaded that Plaintiffs have standing to enforce Education Code section 89005.5. Even if they did have 'beneficial interest' or 'taxpayer' standing, this would not necessarily permit for an action directing election officials to invalidate an initiative petition."

SoccerCity attorneys tried to demonstrate that the Friends of SDSU statement of reasons document was misleading and violated the law. To this Wohlfeil ruled, "The Court

concludes that the statement of reasons is an advocacy document, but it does not contain misleading assertions of fact that are false beyond dispute."

Read his final ruling below:

Superior Court Judge Joel Wohlfeil's Final Ruling:

Lawsuit Background

A lawsuit brought by SoccerCity charged that the Friends of SDSU initiative violated the education, government and elections code by using the SDSU logo and name in marketing and advertising materials for their initiative to remake Mission Valley into SDSU West.

This was the first of three lawsuits set to go before Superior Court judges this summer. The next court hearings re: the City Attorney's lawsuits are expected to begin in July.

You can find IVN San Diego's coverage of the judges tentative ruling here.

Friends of SDSU Responds

The Friends of SDSU released the following statement:

IVP Donate

Today the Superior Court of California rejected a lawsuit backed by SoccerCity promoters to remove SDSU West from the November ballot, declaring Friends of SDSU and its SDSU West initiative’s use of the San Diego State University name in its campaign is legal and appropriate. Today’s ruling also affirmed the intention of the SDSU West initiative to empower the City of San Diego to sell the Mission Valley stadium site to San Diego State University at fair market value for a campus expansion including research facilities, a stadium and river park.

“The court’s decision affirms that SDSU West creates the opportunity to expand San Diego State University and grow the regional economy through an open and transparent process,” said Bill Hammett, Friends of SDSU steering committee member. “Today’s decision also makes it clear that the frivolous FS Investors-backed lawsuit lacked any merit in its allegations, because SDSU West fully complies with California State Law, San Diego City Charter and the California Education Code.”

SoccerCity has yet to respond to IVN San Diego's request for a news release.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read