Skip to content
Sign up free
Election Reform

DC Independent Voters Are Pissed City Officials Have Denied Them Open Primaries

Washington DC is about to hold its 2026 primary elections, but even though voters wanted them to be open, they remain closed.
Photo by Jorge Alcala on Unsplash

Primary elections in Washington, DC, are coming up in June. However, while three-quarters of the city’s electorate voted for them to be open to independent voters, they won’t be – because city officials refuse to make the switch from a closed partisan system.

By Shawn Griffiths

2-minute read

Primary elections in Washington, DC, are coming up in June. However, while three-quarters of the city’s electorate voted for them to be open to independent voters, they won’t be – because city officials refuse to make the switch from a closed partisan system.

And independent voters in DC are understandably upset.

Tanya Hutchins, who has worked in all areas of multimedia, posted a video on her social media accounts expressing frustration with the DC City Council. “I’m a DC voter who is pissed off that Council will not fully fund Initiative 83,” she says in the video. 

“The issue passed last year with nearly 75%. It approved ranked choice voting, but it also approved allowing independents like me to vote in primaries.”
DC Dems to Independent Voters: You Don’t Matter
The DC City Council had one final opportunity to fund a provision approved by 73% of city voters in November that would open primary elections to 83,000+ independent voters – and the Democratic-controlled body elected instead not to honor the will of voters.

As Hutchins noted, Initiative 83 was approved by voters in 2024 with 73% of the vote. The citizen-driven measure called for open primaries that allow independent voters to participate in critical taxpayer-funded elections and the use of ranked choice voting in all city elections.

Throughout the course of the election and after, Initiative 83 was the subject of controversy:

  • The Democratic Party sued to block it.
  • Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser kept it off her initial FY2026 proposed budget.
  • DC city council members said its implementation should be debated after voters made their desires clear.

In July 2025, the city council voted 8-4 to fund the ranked choice voting portion of Initiative 83, but did not include open primaries. Independent voters remain locked out of elections that decide most contests in a heavily Democratic city.

“Council says they have to print more ballots and educational materials,” says Hutchins, referring to claims of added costs to elections. In reality, the implementation of open primaries would account for 0.007% of the city’s multi‑billion-dollar budget.

The actions by the DC City Council have even gotten the Washington Post to pen an editorial asking, "Why are DC Democrats so afraid of independent voters?" 

There is a DC City Council meeting scheduled for May 1. Hutchins encourages independent voters to go to the hearing and demand their right to vote. “I sent in my written testimony, basically saying, ‘Let independents vote!’"

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

DC Independent Voters Are Pissed City Officials Have Denied Them Open Primaries

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us