Why Are Democrats in DC Failing to Implement an Initiative Passed by 73% of Voters?

vote here sign with people standing in line to vote.
Image generated by IVN staff.
Published: 15 Jul, 2025
Updated: 29 Jul, 2025
4 min read

WASHINGTON, DC - Back in November, DC voters overwhelmingly approved Initiative 83, a measure that called for semi-open primaries and ranked choice voting (RCV) in all city elections. The problem – the DC City Council has yet to fully fund it.

To clarify, about 73% of voters said “Yes” to ranked choice voting and giving the city’s 84,000 independent voters a say in taxpayer-funded primary elections, but so far, the City Council has only approved funding for one of those reforms.

Council members voted 8-4 Monday to fund RCV in city elections starting with the June 2026 primaries. However, the Council stopped short of funding the initiative’s open primaries component. 

Lisa D.T. Rice, proposer of Initiative 83 and Founding CEO of Grow Democracy DC, celebrated the partial victory in a statement:

The journey to this historic day has been long, but well worth the effort to give DC voters more voice and more choice in our elections. While the entirety of Initiative 83 wasn’t funded today, we celebrate these eight Councilmembers' commitment to expanding democracy in the District, the driving force behind Initiative 83.”

She added that she is hopeful Council members will secure funding for open primaries when they conduct the second and final budget vote on July 28. The funding allocated for RCV rollout includes money for voter education and election staff training.

Why the Delay? Resistance from Democratic Leadership

Funding Initiative 83 is a subject of controversy in the nation’s capital as it has faced resistance from the Democratic Party. Its leaders and representatives in city government have used every excuse they can think of to deny voters their reforms.

For example, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who opposed Initiative 83 during the campaign and characterized RCV as “a very complicated election system,” did not include funding for the measure’s implementation in her initial Fiscal Year 2026 budget proposal.

Then, during a Ward 8 candidate forum on June 2, some of the candidates vying for a seat on the City Council said DC should delay implementation, including Mike Austin, who claimed there was some “confusion in how it was agendized and presented to the community.”

IVP Donate

He also accused the Initiative 83 campaign of fraud – referring to an administrative order from the DC Board of Elections on April 14 that 4 members of Make All Votes Count DC be fined $37,000 for altering 125 voter addresses on petitions submitted for the initiative. 

This became known as the “White-out controversy.” It is worth noting that Make All Votes Count submitted more than 40,000 signatures and needed 22,500 signatures to qualify for the ballot, including 5% of registered voters in each of DC’s 8 wards.

At the same forum, candidate Salim Adofo rejected the “voter confusion” narrative on the initiative – especially given the massive support for it on Election Day. 

“I would support [Initiative 83 implementation], especially because over 73% of the city wanted to support it, which tells me that over 73% of the city can’t be unaware or not knowledgeable of something,” Adofo said.

Councilmember Anita Bonds, who chairs the City Council's elections committee, questioned the timing and completeness of implementing citizen-led ballot initiatives, citing the need for more debate and mentioning ongoing litigation.

This ongoing litigation was brought by the DC Democratic Party, which began a legal crusade against election reform even before Initiative 63 qualified for the ballot and has since filed multiple lawsuits to deny voters popular electoral changes.

The whole situation escalated to the point that the Washington Post published an editorial titled, “DC Democrats tarnish themselves by resisting ranked choice voting.”

Who Is Defending Democracy?

The City Council reconvenes on July 28 to finalize the FY 2026 budget. This vote represents the last opportunity to secure funding for the open primaries portion of Initiative 83, which would affect just 0.007% of the city’s multi‑billion-dollar budget.

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

Cost is not the issue. The issue is whether the City Council will fully honor the will of voters or cherry pick the reform they can live with at the expense of equal voting rights for independent voters.

DC is a one-party city. There is not a single Republican on the 13-member City Council and the only reason why there are 2 non-Democrats is because of the Home Rule Act, which states that a maximum of 3 out of the 4 at-large seats may be held by the majority party.

This means city elections are effectively decided in closed partisan primaries, giving the Democratic Party the most control over electoral outcomes while the city's independent voters are denied a meaningful say in elections.

Note: There are more than 3x the number of registered independent voters in DC than registered Republicans.

Supporters of Initiative 83 are encouraging active civic engagement ahead of the July 28 Council vote, mobilizing independent voters and community groups to press councilmembers to honor the results of the November election.

Related articles

state of Louisiana with a closed stamp over it.
Louisiana’s New Voting System: Closed, Confusing, and Costly
Louisiana is making the switch to closed partisan primaries for some elections in 2026, using a syst...
30 Jul, 2025
-
6 min read
Stop light with the capitol building in the background.
DC Dems to Independent Voters: You Don’t Matter
The DC City Council had one final opportunity to fund a provision approved by 73% of city voters in November that would open primary elections to 83,000+ independent voters – and the Democratic-controlled body elected instead not to honor the will of voters....
29 Jul, 2025
-
2 min read
Michael Smerconish
Michael Smerconish Leads Lawsuit Against Both Political Parties
CNN host Michael Smerconish is a Pennsylvania voter who is denied access to taxpayer-funded primaries because he is a registered non-party affiliate (independent). He is also one of the plaintiffs in a new lawsuit challenging his state’s use of closed primaries. ...
22 Jul, 2025
-
1 min read

Latest articles

Gas station weed signs next to Texas flag
Texas Senate Votes to Ban Gas Station Weed Again -- Will Abbott Go Along This Time?
AUSTIN, TX — The Texas Senate on August 1 passed a bill that would ban all intoxicating hemp-derived...
01 Aug, 2025
-
2 min read
House of Cards logo in front of Texas Capitol
Texas Redistricting Drama Turns into 'House of Cards' Episode
As Texas Republicans push forward with a controversial plan to redraw the state’s congressional districts, Democrats are weighing whether to deploy one of their most extreme forms of resistance: a quorum break....
31 Jul, 2025
-
4 min read
US Capitol Building with American Flags in front.
Five Seats, One Revolution: Independents Launch Political Disruptor
One week after hosting its inaugural event in DC, the founders of The Independent Center announced the formation of the Independent PAC, a hybrid political action committee designed to do one thing: deny the two major parties a majority in Congress....
31 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read