Skip to content
Subscribe

Poll: There's Strong Support Among Independents for Trump's Bipartisan Potential

The Independent Center released the fourth and final installment to its 2025 State of the Union Poll, highlighting where independent voters, Democrats, and Republicans have the most secure common ground.

Poll: There's Strong Support Among Independents for Trump's Bipartisan Potential
Photo by Gage Skidmore / Flickr. Creative commons license.
Published:

The Independent Center released the fourth and final installment to its 2025 State of the Union Poll, highlighting where independent voters, Democrats, and Republicans have the most secure common ground.

The results come from the responses of 500 independents, 500 Democrats, and 500 Republicans and reveal two key areas of common ground:

One, voters across the political spectrum want President Trump and Congress to focus on the economy. More than 8-in-10 Republicans (87%) and Democrats (81%) want to see policy that prioritizes lower prices and inflation reduction.

Additionally, 78% of independents said the same thing.

The second key finding was continued support for cross-partisan cooperation. When asked what the best candidate was to represent the respondent, nearly half of all participants (46%) said someone who worked with both parties.

This is compared to the 19% who said they wanted a candidate who only worked with Democrats and the 24% who said, "only Republicans."

Further, the survey asked if respondents wanted to see Trump "succeed or fail at working across the aisle to enact bipartisan policies as President." A strong majority (62%) said they wanted to see success.

"The data indicates that voters tend to favor political cooperation over strict party alignment," writes Ethan Nelson at The Independent Center.

"With nearly half of respondents preferring representatives who work across party lines and strong majorities supporting bipartisan success, the survey suggests an appetite for cooperative political approaches."

Notably, Republicans drove the high majority that wanted to see bipartisan success from Trump at 83%. Nearly a third of Democrats said they wanted to see Trump fail even if he reached across the aisle.

This is still not as high as the national partisan narrative would suggest. A plurality of Democrats (46%) said they wanted to see Trump succeed if he took a bipartisan approach to policy and governing.

And, the sentiment was shared by 58% of independents.

"These findings may have implications for both the administration and Congress as they consider their legislative approaches in 2025, particularly in addressing fiscal concerns that appear to unite voters across the political spectrum," writes Nelson.

Check out the poll's full topline here as well as Nelson's complete analysis.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Poll: There's Strong Support Among Independents for Trump's Bipartisan Potential

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us