Skip to content

Elon Musk's $1.5 Million Attack on Ranked Choice Voting in Alaska | EP52

Elon Musk, the DNC, and State Republicans are all fighting the same enemy: Your right to a meaningful vote.

Elon Musk's $1.5 Million Attack on Ranked Choice Voting in Alaska | EP52

Elon Musk just quietly put $1.5 million behind a network aimed at killing Alaska's Top Four open primary. The kicker: the same measure would repeal the transparency law that let anyone find out he paid for it.

Then the crew digs into Musk's money in Alaska: who's really behind the repeal, why MAGA wants Alaska's system gone, and why Chad argues closed primaries are voter suppression on a scale that dwarfs every voter ID fight in the country. Cara's back from the California Politico Agenda Summit in Sacramento with a Nancy Pelosi scoop about what she actually told Joe Biden before he dropped out - and Chad refuses to let Pelosi off the hook.

Along the way: a New York poll where a third of Democrats admit they're not really Democrats and Abdul El-Sayed's viral shot at John Fetterman.

Poll Finds that a Majority of New York Democrats Don’t Really Want to be Democrats
New polling finds most registered Democrats support letting independents vote in Democratic primaries — and nearly 4 in 10 say they only registered Democratic because New York City gives them no other meaningful choice.

This episode is sponsored by the Independent Voter Project and produced by Olas Media. Listen on Spotify or Apple Podcasts.

The Independent Voter Podcast also has its own YouTube channel! If you enjoy these conversations, 
subscribe to our dedicated channel for full episodes, interviews, and future content.

Episode Highlights

On this episode of the Independent Voter Podcast, hosts Chad, Cara, and Ethan dig into Elon Musk's controversial funding of Wisconsin-based "Aurora Network," which has funneled roughly $1 million toward repealing Alaska's Top Four nonpartisan open primary system — one of the most closely watched ranked choice voting (RCV) states in the country.

The hosts highlight that the repeal effort also targets a campaign finance transparency measure, meaning voters would lose visibility into who's bankrolling the fight against election reform.

Chad argues this puts Musk, Alaska Republicans, and national Democrats on the same side against open primaries, framing the effort as part of a broader, coordinated push — echoed in California's "Undo the Top Two" initiative and closed-primary battles in New York, Florida, and Texas — to roll back nonpartisan primary reforms nationwide.

The Voting Rights Case That Could Turn Both Parties Against the Supreme Court
One question is playing out in courtrooms, on ballots, and in legislatures across the country: who controls primary elections, the parties or the voters. Only SCOTUS can settle it, and when it does, it will put both parties on one side and the voters on the other.

The conversation turns to closed primaries and voter suppression, with Chad making the case that barring independent voters from primary elections — unless they falsely register with a party — amounts to a modern-day poll tax and a violation of First Amendment association rights.

Citing journalist Mike Madrid's Sacramento Bee op-ed, the hosts note that Latino and Asian voters register as independents at disproportionately higher rates than white voters, undercutting the narrative that closing primaries protects minority representation.

They also reference an Open Primaries-commissioned poll in New York City showing that roughly a third of self-identified Democrats — and nearly half of Latino Democrats — say they register with the party purely to have a "meaningful vote" in the dominant primary election, not out of genuine partisan affiliation.

Beyond policy, the trio riffs on current political theater: Nancy Pelosi's comments at the California Politico Agenda Summit about urging President Biden toward a cognitive test before he dropped out, plus Chad's ongoing critique of her ripping up Trump's State of the Union speech.

They also discuss the viral clip of Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El Sayed sparring with John Fetterman, and close with lighter banter on political charisma, gerrymandering, and the state of congressional term limits discourse.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

More in Independent Voter Podcast

See all