Skip to content
Subscribe

Are PACs Trying to Keep Voters from Participating in Calif. Senate District 7?

Published:

Update: Information provided to IVN suggests that there was confusion in the name of the PAC based on how it appears on the secretary of state's website, which alphabetizes names so that the candidate's name appears first. The article has been updated and corrected.

Editor's note: The initial published version of this article said the name of the PAC was Glazer For Senate 2015 Sponsored By Labor Organizations; Working Families. The name is Glazer For Senate 2015 Sponsored By Labor Organizations; Working Families Opposing. The article has been updated to reflect this correction. A consultant for the PAC brought the following concern to our attention:

pac-concenrs

The consultant also sent an email to the author:

consultant-email-2

Political action committees are known for using names that are often esoteric and forgettable. As

previously reported on IVN, PAC names are based on generic ideas that conform to a specific theme. The goal of a PAC's name in not necessarily to deceive, but to spread a desired message without establishing brand recognition.

It is not uncommon for a PAC to send out arguably deceptive mailers or release vicious attack ads. Voters in California Senate District 7 have seen plenty of this, but there are several odd things popping up in the special election for the district.

Working Families Opposing Glazer For Senate 2015 Sponsored By Labor Organizations has raised over $1.8 million in what is likely going to be one of the most expensive special elections for State Senate in California's history.

Kind of a mouth full, isn't it? Because of how the secretary of state alphabetizes PAC names to list the name of the candidate first, the PAC appears as "Glazer For Senate 2015 Sponsored By Labor Organizations; Working Families Opposing," on financial reports, which can be confusing for anyone who is not familiar with the secretary of state's website. It begs the question as to why a PAC opposing Steve Glazer would put "Glazer for Senate 2015" in its name at all.

Democrats Steve Glazer and Assemblymember Susan Bonilla advanced to the general election in district 7 as a result of California’s nonpartisan, top-two primary. Glazer placed first in the primary with 33 percent of the vote, while Bonilla, who is backed by the Democratic Party, placed second with 24.9 percent.The primary was marred with controversy after another PAC, the Asian American Small Business PAC, sent mailers out supporting Republican

Michaela Hertle weeks after she dropped out of the race and endorsed Glazer.

The Sacramento Bee reported that Glazer believed it was an attempt to keep him from placing in one of the top two spots in the primary. The California Republican Party filed a trademark lawsuit against the PAC for using Republican images in the mailers.

There are quite a few instances of unusual PAC behavior going on in this hotly contested race — much of which has specifically targeted Glazer and is supported by “Big Labor.” Glazer hasn’t garnered much support from labor groups since he opposed the BART strikes in 2014.

However, some attempts to deceive voters may not escape scrutiny from the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), a state agency charged with investigating alleged violations of the Political Reform Act of 1974. (Think of it as the state equivalent of the FEC.) There is certainly some dirty politics going on in district 7, some of which could be categorized as fraudulently misleading.

The winner of the special election in Senate District 7 will not be decided by Democrats as it would have under the old semi-closed primary system since registered Democrats overwhelmingly outnumber any other voting bloc in the district. The election will be decided by voters outside the party, which means the winner will be the one who can more broadly appeal to Democrats, Republicans, and independents.

Many Republicans and voters outside the Democratic Party have gotten behind Glazer. Therefore, the logical strategy for any PAC that opposes a candidate with broader appeal than their own is to dissuade voters outside the Democratic Party from participating altogether. Negative attack ads and dirty politics can disgust voters to the point of staying home on election day; especially, independent voters.

Whether or not this strategy works remains to be seen. The special election for Senate District 7 will take place on May 19, 2015.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Are PACs Trying to Keep Voters from Participating in Calif. Senate District 7?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us