Skip to content
Sign up free
Election Reform

NYC Shuts Out Half Its Voters. The Forward Party Supports a New Bill to Change That.

A New York City bill would end party control over elections and level the playing field for independent voters.
Image: Luca Bravo on Unsplash.

The polarization we see in our politics is not a mystery. It is the predictable output of a system designed to produce it. Nothing meaningful can change until we fix the structure that keeps producing these outcomes.

By Susan DiVito

5-minute read

NEW YORK CITY, N.Y. – I have lived in New York City for more than a decade, and I have never voted in an election that actually mattered. Not by choice, but because being an independent in this city means I am locked out of the elections that decide everything.

By the time November arrives, the winner has already been chosen, by a small fraction of registered Democrats in a low-turnout primary I was never allowed to enter. In a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans by more than six to one, and where districts have been drawn to guarantee that margin holds, the general election is just a formality.

And I’m not alone. A record 45% of Americans now identify as political independents, according to a January 2026 Gallup survey – the highest level since Gallup began tracking party identification in 1988 – while both major parties have fallen to just 27% each.

In New York City specifically, more than 1-in-5 registered voters, over one million people, are unaffiliated with any party, according to New York City’s Campaign Finance Board. Every one of us is shut out of the elections that matter most, denied any real say by a system built for parties, not people. 

Over 1 Million Unaffiliated Voters Left Out of NYC Primaries, CFB Report Finds
New York City has a massive voter suppression problem. A new report from the NYC Campaign Finance Board (CFB) found that 1-in-5 voters (21.1%) in the city are registered unaffiliated and are excluded from taxpayer-funded primary elections.

But this is not just about who gets to vote. A system built around closed partisan primaries actively rewards extremism, polarization, and disenfranchisement. When candidates only need to win over a small, highly partisan base, there is no incentive to govern for the broader public and every incentive to perform for the base, resist compromise, and treat every policy question as a loyalty test.

The polarization we see in our politics is not a mystery. It is the predictable output of a system designed to produce it. Nothing meaningful can change until we fix the structure that keeps producing these outcomes.

Consider what we are actually voting on at the local level. Potholes do not care about party registration. Neither do school budgets, public transit, or safe streets. When we sort municipal elections by party, we import national culture wars into races that have nothing to do with them, bypassing the real needs of the city and each neighborhood.

This is why I joined Forward Party New York and why, on behalf of Forward, am proud to announce Forward Party New York’s endorsement of a landmark new bipartisan bill introduced by Council Member Frank Morano (R) that would require nonpartisan ranked choice elections for all New York City municipal offices.

What the Bill Does

This bill (Int. No. 0314-2026) would remove party labels from all New York City municipal elections, including races for mayor, public advocate, comptroller, borough president, and City Council, replacing the current partisan primary and general election structure with a single nonpartisan general election using ranked choice voting.

Candidates would qualify through the independent nominating petition process rather than party primaries, meaning no voter is excluded from the start and no party gatekeeper controls who gets to run. The bill already has bipartisan co-sponsorship from Council Members Farah N. Louis (D) and Vickie Paladino (R), and it would take effect only after approval by a majority of New York City voters through a ballot question at a general election.

The people, not the party politicians, would have the final say.

A Model That Already Works Here

This is not a radical experiment being imported from somewhere else. New York City already uses nonpartisan ranked choice elections when city office vacancies occur mid-term, filling seats through a process with no party primary, no party labels, and open participation for every registered voter regardless of affiliation.

The process is clean, competitive, and fair, with no party labels and no backroom deals. Research from the Bipartisan Policy Center and Unite America finds that nonpartisan elections consistently draw broader participation, more candidates, and a more representative electorate than closed partisan systems.

The evidence that it works is already built into the city's own election history. The Morano bill simply asks why a process good enough to fill a City Council vacancy is not good enough for every city election.

An Outlier Among Major Cities

What makes New York City's situation particularly striking is how far out of step it is compared to other major American cities. Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, and Dallas, for example, all conduct municipal elections on a nonpartisan basis.

Candidates appear without party labels, no partisan primary narrows the field before the public has a say, and elected officials must build coalitions broad enough to win over the whole electorate rather than just their party base.

New York City remains one of the only cities of its scale still running fully partisan municipal elections, clinging to a model that its peers long ago recognized as a barrier to good governance rather than a guarantor of it.

Why Forward Party New York Supports This Bill

When the incentive in every election is to appeal to a narrow partisan base rather than the community at large, leaders who try to govern differently do so at their own political peril. Politicians choose their voters rather than voters choosing their politicians. That system has to change first. 

This bill is not a partisan measure. It does not favor Democrats or Republicans; it favors voters. I am grateful for Council Member Morano's leadership in pushing it forward, because it takes genuine political will to challenge the structures that protect incumbent power in a city as entrenched as New York. 

New Yorkers who believe in fair elections, regardless of party or lack thereof, should contact their council members and make their voices heard. Ranked choice voting helps ensure that winners reflect broad support rather than narrow plurality. Nonpartisan elections ensure that every voter has a meaningful say in every race. Together, these reforms would make New York City's elections worthy of the city they are supposed to serve. 

About The Author

Susan DiVito is a member of the state leadership team at Forward Party New York, a chapter of the national Forward Party, putting power back in the hands of voters through real alternatives to the two-party system and election reform. For more information, visit forwardparty.com and join the movement at forwardparty.com/new_york.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

NYC Shuts Out Half Its Voters. The Forward Party Supports a New Bill to Change That.

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us