Skip to content
Subscribe

New Wisconsin Abortion Law Requires Ultrasound, Follows Popular Trend

Published:

Credit: Planned Parenthood Advocates of WI

Wisconsin abortion law

Americans remain divided over their views on abortion. The Gallup survey recently reported that about 45 percent of Americans identify as pro-choice and 48 percent regard themselves as pro-life. States across the country reflect this polarization depending on who holds control of the governorship and the state legislature.

Wisconsin is the most recent state to enter these debates and moved this past week towards further restrictions on abortion rights. The state’s Republican-led Assembly passed a law that requires women to first undergo an ultrasound before an abortion can be performed. The bill also restricts the amount of doctors eligible to perform abortions, requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital.

Projected 2016 presidential hopeful, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, is expected to sign the bill into law.

The bill follows legislation in states around the country which make obtaining an abortion more difficult. Earlier this year, North Dakota passed a law that outlawed abortions as early as six weeks into a pregnancy or when a fetal heartbeat is detected.

Arkansas saw similar restrictions when their state outlawed abortions after twelve weeks while Kansas signed a bill into law that declared that life begins at fertilization.

This bill in Wisconsin mandates results of the ultrasound, which include images, a description of the fetus, and visualization of the fetal heartbeat be provided to the woman before she can obtain an abortion.

Together these bills signify a shift in the right’s strategies to use legislation to restrict abortions around the country.

However, the Gallup poll, which reflected the sharp, but evenly divided pro-choice and pro-life sentiment in the country, also touches upon the growing polarization over this issue.

Planned Parenthood, for example, organized a protest on the steps of the Wisconsin State Capitol, while legal organizations such as the Center for Reproductive Rights have worked to challenge these laws in court. CRR was successful in getting a judge to issue an injunction in Arkansas to block the enactment of the 12 week abortion ban law, but are still working to counter some of the other more recent legislation.

With the 2014 midterm election looming not far in the horizon, this slew of new legislation will undoubtedly take center stage in the court of public opinion as both sides attempt to appeal to their bases by moving even further away from the center on issues of reproductive rights. Wisconsin, formerly a bastion of progressivism, is just the latest casualty in the continued fights over this issue.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

New Wisconsin Abortion Law Requires Ultrasound, Follows Popular Trend

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us