Skip to content

New Mexico Supreme Court Blocks Straight-Party Voting

New Mexico Supreme Court Blocks Straight-Party Voting
Published:

SANTA FE, N.M. - The New Mexico Supreme Court has rejected Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver's attempt to implement straight-ticket (aka straight-party or one-party) voting for the November election. In a unanimous decision Wednesday, the court ruled that Toulouse Oliver did not have the authority under state law to take such action.

The court sided with the plaintiffs' argument that the authority to implement straight-ticket voting belonged to the legislature -- which previously repealed the statute that allowed the ballot option's use.

"Did the Legislature intend to delegate its discretionary authority over straight-party voting to the secretary of state? It clearly did not," said Chief Justice Judith Nakamura

The justices also expressed skepticism over the argument that straight-ticket voting was a tool to speed up the voting process, which advocates claimed would encourage higher turnout and participation in down-ballot races.

"It's not as if a party affiliation at this point is being hidden," said Justice Charles Daniels, pointing out that voters could easily see a candidate's party affiliation next to his or her name.

The secretary of state's sudden announcement that she was going to add straight-ticket voting was immediately met with broad criticism. It was reported that several counties even revolted against the decision, as county commissioners called on local clerks to ignore it.

Photo Credit: vepar5 / shutterstock.com

Shawn M Griffiths

Election Reform Editor for IVN.us since 2012. Studied history and philosophy at University of North Texas. Covers political and election reform efforts nationwide with deep expertise on the reform movement. Based in San Diego, CA.

IVN is rated Center by AllSides and High Credibility by MBFC — follow our independent journalism in your feed.

Add IVN on Google

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.