Skip to content
Subscribe

NDAA Poses Threat to Women's Military Rights

Published:

credit: Daily Banter

credit: Daily Banter

Military men and women are not afforded the same whistle-blowing rights as civilian men and women. Furthermore, the award-winning documentary film The Invisible War claims that a woman in the military has more likelihood of being raped by a fellow serviceman than killed by the enemy. But military women do not have the same access to justice.

There is a bill in the House, H.R. 1960, to amend the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and Representatives Jackie Speier (D-CA) and Mike Coffman (R-CO) are offering an amendment that would give our military men and women equal rights with their civilian counterparts in both the areas of whistle blowing and justice for sexual assault. Military rights should equal civilian rights if you believe our service men and women are still citizens.

The Fourteenth Amendment provides for Equal Protection Under The Law as it pertains to the States. It has come to be applied to the Federal government through the Fifth Amendment. We now live in a duopoly which is funded by corporations', millionaires', and billionaires' campaign contributions, and "reported" on by the media which is essentially a monopoly of seven giant media companies.

Military actions are often undertaken for dubious or narrow interests. Whistle blowers remain one of the few checks to balance government power. With regard to our military women's rights, it sends a very strange message to the rest of the world that, We, The People, are silent about not giving them the equal protection allowed to civilians. The best form of leadership is by example.

The NDAA is already deeply flawed. Of particular note is the indefinite detention of US citizens without benefit of trial. The ACLU vehemently opposes this provision. I’ve not met any reformer center-left or -right, far-left or far-right, that likes the idea of government having the right to take them away in the middle of the night never to be heard from again. It is rather a dampener on dissent.

In an aGREATER.US poll where conservatives, liberals, and independents are given an equal say, Opposition to Indefinite Detention of US Citizens, Repeal of Sections 1021/22 of the NDAA has an 83% positive approval rating.

This poll did not include restoring the rights of our servicemen and servicewomen to those of their civilian counterparts. But in a recent joint letter to Congress demanding equal treatment for military service members from POGO, the Project of Government Oversight, was signed by conservative  and progressive groups alike, showing it has strong bipartisan support.

Are these abridgment of rights really national security issues or yet more evidence of a government lost touch with the People?

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

NDAA Poses Threat to Women's Military Rights

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us