Skip to content
Subscribe

Marriage Equality in 2012: Uruguay and the U.S. Make Strides

Published:

Photo: ilga.org

On December 11, 2012, Uruguay's House overwhelmingly voted to approve marriage equality in the country. The Senate was scheduled to vote on the bill on December 26, and commentators widely expected the chamber to easily pass the legislation. However, at the last minute, opponents of the bill asked for a postponement on the vote to allow for more public debate. President José Mujica has said he will sign the bill into law as soon as it reaches his desk.

If the law moves forward as expected, Uruguay will join Argentina as only the second Latin American country to legalize same-sex marriage. Uruguay’s progressive politics are taking center stage internationally as it moves forward with this legislation, following legalized abortion and nationalization of marijuana sales.

The U.S., meanwhile, has made its own strides in the marriage equality debate this year. Looking back on the sea of changes to marriage equality in 2012, it all began when Joe Biden independently asserted his support for same-sex marriage in early May. Obama soon followed suit a few days later, when he surprised much of the nation by declaring that he too believed in legalizing same-sex marriages. While earlier in his administration he supported civil unions, he decided his “evolving” views had progressed to a beliefe that marriage equality was an important step forward for the nation.

Political commentators immediately began to analyze how this declaration might alienate independent voters, but public sentiment on the whole appeared to be in process. Gallup Polls, for example, showed that in 2012, for the first time, over 50% of Americans believe same-sex marriages should be recognized by law as valid.

These polling numbers were reflected in the November elections. In both Maryland and Maine, voters approved ballot measures to allow for same-sex marriage. After failing in dozens of elections around the country in the past (32 times to be exact), for the first time, the popular vote reflected the dramatic social change that has been occurring around the United States.

In 2004, same-sex marriage was placed on the ballot as a tactic to draw out conservative voters to the poll and mobilize the base. Now, just eight years late, voters approved the measure in two separate states. Previously, states that legalized same-sex marriages were only able to do so legislatively or through judicial action.

Between the delay in Uruguay’s vote yesterday and the Supreme Court’s announcement earlier this month that it will hear arguments on the constitutionality of DOMA and California’s Prop 8, the issue is not resolved by any means in either nation. However, 2012 has truly been a year in which great strides have been made for LGBT rights in both nations. It remains to be seen whether 2013 will continue this trend.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Marriage Equality in 2012: Uruguay and the U.S. Make Strides

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us