Skip to content
Sign up free
Alaska

In Alaska, 'Decoy Dan' Was A Meme Vote, Not A Confused Vote

In Alaska, 'Decoy Dan' Was A Meme Vote, Not A Confused Vote
Image: Alaska Democratic US Senate nominee Mary Peltola from December 2024. Credit: Mattie Neretin/CNP/Sipa USA on Alamy. License obtained and used exclusively by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths for editorial purposes only.

In Alaska's Senate race, votes for "Decoy Dan" Sullivan appear to be protest and joke votes rather than confused ballots, with most second-choice selections going to Democrat Mary Peltola rather than incumbent Dan Sullivan.

By Shawn Griffiths

2-minute read

ANCHORAGE—The midterm elections aren’t over yet. Votes are still being counted. The Mississippi US Senate race is closer than anyone expected. And in Alaska, as many as 75,000 ballots remain outstanding, including in the closely watched Senate race.

But with all the accusations flying around that the “Decoy Dan” situation was going to cause broad confusion, available information on ranked-choice returns tells a different story.

Specifically, many votes for Daniel J. Sullivan were protest and “for the laugh” votes.

The chart in the above tweet comes from data accessed by the New York Times.

It shows that nearly two-thirds of the 3,600 people who voted for Daniel J. Sullivan (so far) ranked a second option. Almost 30% ranked Democrat Mary Peltola second. Only 16% ranked US Sen. Dan Sullivan second.

This contradicts the narrative from Republican leaders that Alaskans who vote for “Decoy Dan” really meant to vote for the incumbent. It also shows that ranked choice voting is doing its job.

Many voters didn’t rank a second choice, and that is their prerogative. Many of these voters may have actually wanted to vote for Daniel J Sullivan. Some also did it as a joke, a meme, or a protest against the party options.

The fact that Peltola ranks highest among second-choice selections also indicates that many were fully aware of their actions when they voted for “Decoy Dan,” and it was to have a little fun knowing that their actual preference will carry over in a ranked-choice runoff.

I predicted this very outcome on the Independent Voter Podcast this week before this information was available.

There is also an indication that some voters who cast a ballot for Daniel J. Sullivan did indeed mean to vote for the incumbent. It’s a small percentage, but it represents as many as 500-600 votes.

If Peltola doesn’t cross a majority, their true preference will be applied in the second round of vote tabulation after “Decoy Dan” is eliminated. It won’t help the incumbent much, but the vote will transfer into the final total.

This is how ranked choice voting is supposed to work. It is supposed to help voters fully express their preferences at the ballot, which can include voting only for a preferred candidate or expressing a protest vote before indicating which of the top candidates a voter prefers.

It can even help mitigate the effect partisan dirty tricks like recruiting a same-name candidate can have on the results.

Maybe this is one reason why the repeal effort keeps failing.

The next substantial batch of votes in Alaska’s elections is expected to be announced on Tuesday, November 10. Peltola will need about 55% of remaining first-choice selections to win outright.

If not, who wins will come down to one or two rounds of ranked-choice runoffs.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  3. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  4. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  5. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  6. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  7. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  8. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  9. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  10. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

In Alaska, 'Decoy Dan' Was A Meme Vote, Not A Confused Vote

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us