Skip to content
Subscribe

I Am Tired of This S***hole Conversation

Published:

We have devoted the 24-hour news cycle to a single word -- "shithole." That is where we are at in the media and the national narrative in 2018.

The story erupted after it was reported that President Donald Trump used the word "shithole" to describe Haiti and African nations when discussing US immigration policy with members of Congress Thursday.

And the mainstream media jumped all over it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrynNeqx48I

Video Source: Washington Post

Trump denied saying anything derogatory about Haiti on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/951813216291708928

This was quickly disputed by US Sen. Dick Durbin, who said that he indeed used this language, and this has become the focus of the national narrative -- for liberal and conservative media channels. Front Page of CNN

Front Page of FoxNews

Front Page of Huffington Post

Headline on Drudge Report

Should we have a conversation on whether or not such language, if used, is appropriate for the President of the United States? Sure. But that is not even the conversation we are having right now nor the end goal of it.

Indeed, the word the president is being accused of using is exactly what this conversation has turned into.

This is another example of a media industry that is more interested in picking a side in the two parties' attempt to control the national dialogue than keeping the American people informed.

It is another example of the knee-jerk, "gotcha journalism" that seeks to pit the public against each other over childish partisan games to score political points and race-baiting.

And the biggest loser is not Donald Trump or Democrats or even the media. All of these people are getting exactly what they want.

The biggest loser is the American people, because we are trapped in a seemingly never-ending cycle of manufactured outrage and hyper-partisanship.

Immigration is an extremely important issue that needs serious attention. Instead of trying to scuttle the negotiations that Republicans and Democrats ultimately agree are needed, both sides should not crow to the media about 4th-grade, he-said-she-said tactics.

We know what is at stake. Border security. The status of 800,000 young people. The future of our country's immigration policy that most people agree desperately needs to be fixed.

The two parties need to stop using the media as a leverage vehicle to injure the other side, and the media needs to stop being a wedge that further divides US voters.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

I Am Tired of This S***hole Conversation

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us