Skip to content
Subscribe

House Members Pat Each Other on the Back for Denying Nazis Social Security

Published:

To clarify, no matter how they came to this country, whether by sneaking in or by invitation, or how hard they may have worked for the rest of their life, no one who participated in war crimes should get government benefits -- whether we are talking about Nazis or other war criminals. This is something most people will agree with.

On Tuesday, December 2, at 4:03 p.m. EST, the U.S. House unanimously passed the "No Social Security for Nazis Act." The bill denies Social Security benefits to anyone who is suspected of having been involved in Nazi war crimes. The bill was introduced after an AP investigation in October revealed that dozens of suspected war criminals and former SS guards have received millions from Social Security checks throughout the years.The war may have ended 69 years ago and according to AP, “there are at least four living beneficiaries,” but that is not stopping members of Congress from touting this "achievement."

Nothing about the content of this bill should bother anyone, except that it comes 7 decades too late. What should bother people the most is that one of the few things that members of Congress are willing to put partisanship aside on is a bill that will not actually do much now that nearly all of these war criminals are dead.

There are dozens of bills awaiting consideration in the House and hundreds of bills waiting in the Senate. The government will shutdown again after December 11 if a budget agreement is not met between House Republicans, Senate Democrats, and President Obama. Yet, members of Congress felt there was time to pass a bill that is, quite frankly, trivial at this point!

“Congress is taking swift action to ensure that these heinous war criminals can no longer exploit a loophole to receive benefits,” U.S. Representative Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.), a co-sponsor of the bill, said. “This vote shows that Congress can and will continue to protect the hard-earned Social Security benefits that millions of Americans rely on.”

First, I wouldn't use the phrase "swift action" to refer to this bill. Second, I doubt the millions who rely on Social Security will find their benefits jeopardized by four people. Third, there are bigger problems with Social Security than this, including millions of young workers today who may not get the benefits they have earned because Social Security will reach a point of insolvency -- maybe sooner than we previously thought.

Congratulations Congress... you're useless...

Photo Credit: Lana V. Erickson / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

House Members Pat Each Other on the Back for Denying Nazis Social Security

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us