Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Has California’s Regulatory Climate Hampered Economic Recovery?

By Lucy Ma

2-minute read

california_business_climate

The Golden State was once seen as a beacon of growth and entrepreneurship- a model economy many sought to imitate. Hard hit by the recession and housing crisis, the state has had its share of struggles when it comes to rebuilding. California, while still the 9th largest economy in the world (having slipped several spots in recent years), is now facing some serious challenges that threaten its long-term prosperity.

When discussing the effects of government policy on economic growth, especially at the state level, the debate centers around business climate. Many business climate rankings, or “indexes”, published in recent years suggest that the state’s arduous regulatory climate and general contempt for business are to blame for the sluggish recovery.

In surveys published by both Chief Executive and Forbes magazine, California has consistently been ranked among the worst states to do business. This doesn’t exactly paint a rosy outlook for the nation’s most populous state, where residents are in dire need of jobs.

In the surveys, the states were graded on a variety of categories including taxation, regulation, workforce quality, and living environment. California has much to offer in terms of human capital and quality of living, but it does not seem to be enough to offset its perceived anti-business outlook. The most frequently cited complaints were against its punitive tax code and aggressive regulatory regime.

While additional state incentives factor into the decision making process, it seems business leaders seek areas with consistent policies and regulations above all else. This allows for focused planning and growth, which is essential to any operation. Having a regulatory environment and regulators that encourage good business- not one that punishes for minor infractions- is key.

There are measures to be taken that can help to bring California’s regulatory process under control, and make it more responsive to the needs of Californians and business alike. A serious reform effort should start with the review of existing regulations, a process that includes the modification and elimination of obsolete, duplicative, and conflicting regulations. In developing and implementing new regulations, an early economic impact assessment is imperative; as policies that are not necessarily geared toward business or the economy may nonetheless have implications on performance.

Certainly, this is not to suggest that all regulations are bad, as many actually help to make for a more attractive locale and boost economic output in the long run. The relationship between any particular policy and economic growth will always be complex, California just needs to develop a more systematic approach toward striking the right balance.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Has California’s Regulatory Climate Hampered Economic Recovery?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us