Skip to content

FEC Nominees Highlight Agency's Dysfunction

FEC Nominees Highlight Agency's Dysfunction
Published:

Credit: 401(K) 2012 via Flickr

Credit: 401(K) 2012 via Flickr

President Obama recently announced his two nominees for the Federal Election Commission (FEC) -- Ann Ravel and Lee E. Goodman.

Ravel, a Democrat, is the chair of the California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC). She has most notably spearheaded an investigation into an Arizona nonprofit group that spent 11 million dollars opposing Prop 30. She's also received criticism for attempting to regulate political blogs and websites in California.

Goodman, a Republican, is well versed in campaign law. He represented George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in the 2000 presidential election. He's currently employed at LeClairRyan, a firm that specializes in corporate law. He unsuccessfully argued against a ban on direct contributions from corporations to politicians and has publicly supported Citizens United.

It's no accident that President Obama nominated members of both parties. By law, the FEC can't have more than three commissioners from any one party.

Furthermore, the commission must have at least four votes to take any action.

These regulations have lead to widespread criticism from reform advocates. Organizations such as Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) claim that the appointment process is broken and, even though nominees must chosen by the president, they're hand picked by party leaders.

“In reality, an informal understanding between the president and the Congress exists whereby the nominees are selected by party leaders. This tacit understanding only enhances the partisan nature of the process, with party leaders nominating commissioners who further their political interests, some of whom are openly hostile toward the very laws they’re charged with enforcing.”

Other groups, such as Common Cause, say the fundamental model of the FEC needs fixing; they propose a nonpartisan solution.

“Congress should model the FEC after more effective law enforcement agencies that are headed by a single administrator who is appointed for a fixed term by the President and confirmed by the Senate......the one federal law enforcement agency that is primarily responsible for overseeing the campaign activities of Members of Congress needs to be better insulated from those it regulates.”

They continue by citing the fact that during the 2008 elections, the country lacked a functioning FEC due to nominations being stuck in the Senate.

Perhaps the most egregious example of the FEC's ineffectiveness comes in a letter sent to President Obama from 8 different groups:

BNA Report

Despite the evidence, the vote to take action failed 3-3.

Currently, five commissioners are serving on expired terms -- the sixth retired. Confirmation hearings have not yet been scheduled.

Raul Carranza

Left leaning aspiring journalist with a passion for healthcare and campaign finance reform. Likes following the facts, wherever they may lead. Currently studying at community college and attended UCLA.

IVN is rated Center by AllSides and High Credibility by MBFC — follow our independent journalism in your feed.

Add IVN on Google

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.