Skip to content
Sign up free
News

Decline to state voters still at the mercy of political parties during primary season

By Adrienne Verrilli

2-minute read

Despite the rising number and growing influence of California’s Decline to State voters, the major political parties can still shut out them out of the primaries if they choose.

Operating on what is known as a modified closed party system, the state's six official political parties - American Independent Party, Democratic Party, Green Party, Libertarian Party, Peace and Freedom Party, and the Republican Party  - determine 135 days prior to the date of the primary for each election cycle whether or not Decline to State voters can participate in their primary.



In 2008 for example, Decline to State voters were allowed to participate in the Democratic primary, but not the Republican primary.   This year, however, Decline to State voters can participate in both.  The intent appears to be when the political parties believe that Decline to State voters will help their party in the general election, they let them vote in the primary.  If not, they shut them out.  If they do choose to allow Decline to State voters to participate, however, the voter must be approved by the party to participate in the primary and is only eligible to vote in one party’s primary.



How did California this complicated system that dilutes the voice of more than 20 percent of increasingly influential California voters?



In 1996, California voters approved Proposition 198 that allowed Decline to State voters to vote for any candidate in any parties’ primary elections.  Passage of the ballot was challenged by the California Democratic, Republican, Libertarian, and Peace and Freedom parties as a violation of the First Amendment right to freedom of association.  And, in June of 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court in a 7-2 vote essentially agreed and overturned Proposition 198.



And back in January 2001, the California legislature adopted the current modified closed system that the state uses today.



So where does California go from here?

On the June ballot, voters will be asked to vote on the Top Two Open Primary initiative known as Proposition 14, which would require that candidates run in a single primary open to all registered voters, with the top two vote-getters meeting in a runoff.  If approved, the law would take effect in 2012.

While Decline to State voters tend to support the measure, critics claim that it has been tried in other states without much success, and actually reduces the choice of candidates, particularly hurting third-party candidates. Critics feel a more traditional open-primary system in California would better ensure that the 1 in 5 California voters have a say in the state’s future.

Proponents of the Top Two Open Primary, however, claim that Proposition 14 will be the catalyst that shakes up California's broken political system, challenges the entrenched parties, and leads to candidates that are forced to appeal to a broader spectrum of voters.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Decline to state voters still at the mercy of political parties during primary season

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us