Skip to content
Sign up free
Health Care

Cross-Border Healthcare: A Complex Problem Meets a Bipartisan Solution

Cross-Border Healthcare: A Complex Problem Meets a Bipartisan Solution
Image created by IVN staff.

While healthcare in California has seen massive investments in coverage and access, these gains often mean little to border residents who split time, family, or even residency across two countries

By Chad Peace

3-minute read

While healthcare in California has seen massive investments in coverage and access, these gains often mean little to border residents who split time, family, or even residency across two countries.

On the other side, private providers in Baja California frequently serve US citizens, especially for dental, vision, or urgent care services, at dramatically lower prices. Still, there's no mechanism to formally integrate or reimburse these services within our system.

It’s not that people aren't seeking care. It’s that the system wasn’t built to reflect how people actually live in border regions.

The Push for a Binational Healthcare Pathway

This is where AB 955, the Cross-Border Healthcare Implementation Act, comes in. The bill was introduced by Assemblymember David Alvarez, who represents the border-straddling 80th District.

The bill proposes something rare: policy that acknowledges the practical reality of binational living.

AB 955 would authorize California to partner with certified Mexican healthcare providers, licensed, accredited, and vetted to US standards, to offer approved medical services to California residents.

Whether through full-service hospitals or contract-based providers, the bill seeks to build a regulated, accessible cross-border healthcare network.

Bipartisan Backing for a Binational Issue

This isn’t just another proposal – it’s one that could generate significant bipartisan, if not universal, consensus.

Earlier this month, AB 955 passed the Assembly Health Committee in a unanimous 16-0 vote, with support from Democrats and Republicans alike. In a time when agreement on even basic public health issues can feel elusive, this level of consensus is notable.

The bill also reflects the cumulative work of legislators from across California, whose focus areas align with the goals of AB 955, even if they don’t all represent border districts:

Former Assemblymember Eduardo Garcia (D-Coachella), for example, has long advocated for California-Mexico collaboration, coauthoring legislation to support the Border Relations Council, which includes healthcare policy. His district includes Imperial County, where cross-border health access is a day-to-day necessity.

State Senator Megan Dahle (R-Bieber) represents rural Northern California, not a border region, but her advocacy for flexible licensing, rural health access, and provider pipelines mirrors the infrastructure needs AB 955 tries to solve on the border.

Assemblymember Tasha Boerner (D-Encinitas) has supported community clinic integration and maternal health equity. Her interest in mobile and community-based delivery models aligns with potential cross-border care delivery approaches.

Together with Alvarez, these legislators bring regional credibility and legislative experience to a conversation that transcends geography and ideology.

When Reality Meets Reform

This isn’t just about cheaper dental care or faster urgent care access. It’s about recognizing how modern communities function and updating our laws to reflect that reality.

Healthcare is deeply personal – but policy doesn’t have to be impersonal. When lawmakers can come together, regardless of party or zip code, to address the real-world needs of their constituents, that’s when democracy actually works.

AB 955 is still making its way through the legislature. But with this kind of bipartisan momentum, and a legislative team that reflects California’s diversity, it just might be the breakthrough border residents have been waiting for.

Editorial Note (May 5, 2025):

While AB 955 introduces a new framework for cross-border healthcare, it’s important to note that Mexican prepaid health plans already exist and are licensed by the California Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC). These plans are exempt from many state-level patient protections under the Knox-Keene Act, including standards for timely access to care, network adequacy, grievance processes, and quality oversight.

DMHC has also reported compliance issues, particularly involving denied emergency care reimbursements at U.S. hospitals. If AB 955 leads to expanded cross-border coverage, it will be essential to hold participating plans to the same standards of care and oversight required of other California health plans to ensure patient protection.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Cross-Border Healthcare: A Complex Problem Meets a Bipartisan Solution

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us