Skip to content
Subscribe

Campaigns Find New Talking Point Against Obamacare after Shaky Open Payments Launch

Published:

With the 2014 midterm elections less than a month away, Republican candidates around the country are continuing to use repealing Obamacare as a major reason why voters should support them and why the GOP needs to take full control over the Legislative Branch once again. From Georgia to Montana, opposition to the troubled health care law has been a core piece in many campaign platforms.

The troubles surrounding Heathcare.gov earlier this year only bolstered their claims. These campaign talking points, however, were weakened by high enrollment numbers, diminishing their impact on the election.

Now, a new report by ProPublica and the New York Times criticizing the government’s new Open Payments website has re-energized the narrative that the federal government has completely bungled its handling of Obamacare.

The purpose of Open Payments is to share the financial relationship between doctors, hospitals, and health care manufacturing companies including pharmaceutical companies. As a part of the Affordable Care Act, the goal of the online forum is to help the public better understand these relationships and how they might influence prescriptions and other medical decisions.

ProPublica, however, slams the website for “not coming anywhere near fulfilling” these objectives.

In the report by Charles Ornstein, a health care reporter, he explains that the website is incredibly confusing, noting that users found it almost impossible to search. Ornstein slams the lack of usability, including search bars being difficult to find, unfriendly data dictionary and methodology documents, and missing names because the information is incomplete.

The same contractor that created Healthcare.gov, CGI Federal, also created the Open Payments website.

On Twitter, various commentators noted how difficult the website was to use:

#sunshineacthttp://t.co/XHdkl5DgOeSeptember 30, 2014
#OpenPaymentsSeptember 30, 2014
#OpenPayments#SunshineActhttp://t.co/SBwNYZpnVoAugust 11, 2014

In addition, the Wall Street Journal has reported major errors within the system already.

Many doctors and medical education companies both object to part of the Open Payments system and claim that the website will breed distrust.

Less than a month before the elections, these complaints are extending beyond the medical field. With yet another government website rollout on health care bungled, the problems only serve to revive Republican objections to Obamacare.

Photo Credit: Evlakhov Valeriy / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Campaigns Find New Talking Point Against Obamacare after Shaky Open Payments Launch

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us