Skip to content
Subscribe

California Taxpayers May Be on the Hook to Bailout Tesla

Published:

Tesla may soon be saved by California -- and its taxpayers.

The State Assembly passed a bill, AB 1184, to increase subsidizes for electric car purchases to $3 billion over the next 7 years. The bill favors manufacturers that make electric-only cars, like Tesla, over companies that sell hybrids.

And there is no bigger electric-only company than Tesla, which means it may soon get a major bailout courtesy of the California taxpayer.

Let me explain.

Tesla will soon hit the limit on the federal tax rebates. These rebates are good for the first 200,000 EVs sold in the US by the manufacturer beginning in December. But that rebate is expected to vaporize in weeks once Tesla's highly-anticipated Model 3 is released, so that’s where Californians come in.

If it wasn’t for the Golden State, Tesla would be in serious trouble. Investors love Tesla, even though the company has lost money every year it's existed, and the company's stock skyrocketed when the new subsidies passed the Assembly.

California State Senator Andy Vidak, a Republican, said of the bill:

“The Tesla Model 3 would be tough to sell without the federal $7,500. But this new bill would push Californian taxpayers into filling the void. It would be a godsend for Tesla.” - Andy Vidak

In California, home of the largest EV market in the US, EV sales have only risen 0.4% since 2012. And that’s with a rebate after the purchase of plug-in electric or fuel cell vehicles ranging between $1,500 and $5,000, depending on the type of vehicle and the income of the buyer.

According to Mercury News, this is how the new taxpayer-funded bill would work:

“The [California Air Resources Board] would determine the size of a rebate based on equalizing the cost of an EV and a comparable gas-powered car. For example, a new, $40,000 electric vehicle might have the same features as a $25,000 gas-powered car. The EV buyer would receive a $7,500 federal rebate, and the state would kick in an additional $7,500 to even out the bottom line.”

So get this, a $100,000 Tesla could have the same features as a $65,000 gas-powered car. The rebate would cover the difference, minus the federal rebate (so $27,500). And because rebates for Teslas will soon be gone, the program would cover the entire difference – $35,000.

Democratic Assemblymember Phil Ting of San Francisco introduced the bill which went before the Senate Appropriations Committee Monday.

The bill also calls for “investing $500 million per year in cap and trade program funds set aside to ensure that disadvantaged communities, school and transit buses, and freight benefit from the transportation electrification.”

There is no word on what will happen if those funds dry up.

Photo Credit: AuKirk / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California Taxpayers May Be on the Hook to Bailout Tesla

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us