Skip to content
Sign up free
News

California takes second shot at federal education money

By Adrienne Verrilli

2-minute read

After losing in the first round, Governor Schwarzenegger has again applied for federal dollars through the “Race to the Top” initiative hoping to secure $700 million for California’s public school system. The Governor staged a public signing of the application in Long Beach, California.

As part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (aka federal stimulus package), the Obama Administration allotted $4.3 billion in federal aid, designed as a competitive program intended to make education reforms in the public schools.  In the first round, 16 states were chosen as finalists. California was not one of them. Only Delaware and Tennessee have been awarded grants under the program.

Unlike the first application that sought funding for the entire state, this application included just seven school systems - San Francisco, Sacramento, Clovis, Fresno, Sanger, Long Beach and Los Angeles – representing nearly 27 percent of the state’s 6.3 million children attending public school. 300 other school districts have pledged their commitment to implementing “Race to the Top” reforms.

While the $700 million is not expected to make a dent in the state’s budget deficit, it may help ease the pain of the 12 percent cuts in K-12 funding during the past three years. And if proven successful, California may be eligible for additional funding.

The Governor signed the application at Lafayette Elementary School in Long Beach because of the successful reforms the school system has implemented. Regarding the application itself, the Governor said, “Our plan meets every goal set forth by President Obama's Race to the Top. It helps ensure that we have effective teachers in every classroom, and it gives us more tools to turn around failing schools.”

Praising Lafayette, the Governor continued, “And it makes better use of the data systems to measure student (academic) growth. This is no different than what they have here at Lafayette. They have a great model right here.” The Long Beach Unified School District (LBUSD) hopes to receive 10s of millions of federal dollars.

It remains unclear why California’s first application was rejected. However, in the current application, it evaluates teachers and principals, places effective teachers in low performing schools, and makes better use of data to measure student progress.

However, the Long Beach Board of Education has not signed on to the agreement, wanting more time to review the content and specifically citing concerns over some of the mandates in the program.  In fact, many schools within the districts that crafted the application have refused to apply.

As reported in the Contra Costa Times, Elsa Valdez, board member of San Bernardino City Unified, stated that, "There are too many strings attached to the funding that are very punitive in nature. One of the biggest drawbacks is grading the teachers on how well students do in the classroom. It seems like one size fits all, and to use it as a cornerstone is a disservice to our students and teachers."

The second round of semi-finalists will be announced in July, and the finalists in late August or early September.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California takes second shot at federal education money

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us