Skip to content
Sign up free
News

California Senate Education Committee to consider capping college fees and tuition

By Adrienne Verrilli

1-minute read

As has been widely reported, the decision in November 2009 by the University of California to increase student tuition by more than 30 percent set off a wave of criticism and protests throughout the state.  Unfortunately, this significant jump in tuition is something California students have been grappling with for several years.

The University of California, California State University and California Community Colleges have raised tuition and fees for their undergraduate degrees 61, 49 and 30 percent respectively over the past five years.  However, these skyrocketing tuition hikes may soon be a thing of the past.



On Wednesday of this week, California’s Senate Education Committee will hold a hearing on SB 969, also known as the California College and University Stabilization Act of 2010.

The bill, introduced by Senator Dean Florez (D-16), caps fees and tuition at five percent per year for all three California systems beginning in 2011-2012.  Fees and tuition would remain stable during a student’s enrollment with increases applying to only new students.



Both UC and CSU have voiced concerns over the legislation.  After being victims of punishing state budget cuts, UC’s administrators do not believe it is possible to maintain a quality education with this kind of cap on tuition unless there is a guarantee from the state for funding.  CSU’s chancellor’s office believes it will unduly burden new students entering the system.



The Senate is not alone is trying to deal with this tuition increase.  In January, Governor Schwarzenneger proposed a constitutional amendment that would guarantee at least 10 percent of the state’s general fund would be earmarked for UC and CSU (this year it was 7.5 percent). June 24 is the last day that the governor has to qualify his proposal for November.



The California system for higher public education was once the envy of the world, providing access to affordable education for all of the state’s residents who sought a secondary degree.

While SB 969 and the governor’s proposal may not prove successful, it is a positive sign that the California legislature and the governor’s office are making sincere efforts to tackle this enormous challenge for the state, the university systems, and in particular, current and future college students.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California Senate Education Committee to consider capping college fees and tuition

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us