Skip to content
Sign up free
News

California Legislative Leaders Face Friday Budget Deadline

By Lucy Ma

3-minute read

california_capitol

Friday, June 15th is California’s constitutional deadline to pass a balanced budget through both houses of the state legislature. According to Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, Democratic leaders are close to making a deal, and the final budget plan will head to the floor for a vote on Friday as scheduled.

Budget talks have been particularly difficult this year as Governor Jerry Brown and Democratic leaders struggled to find agreement on how to close California’s $15.7 billion deficit. Governor Jerry Brown presented a series of heavy but necessary cuts to health and welfare programs earlier this year in his May revise proposal, which quickly received pushback from both Steinberg and Assembly Speaker John Perez. Both Steinberg and Perez have been dropping hints that they’re looking at significantly lowering California’s budget reserve in an effort to fill the gap and avoid cuts at the level Brown has proposed.

Traditionally, a series of “Big 5” budget talks would occur between the Governor and leaders from both parties and houses before a final budget deal was hashed out. This year saw a departure from that routine as Republican leaders have noticeably been left out of the conversation.

Republican leaders are now urging a 48 hour public review period before the Legislative Budget goes for a vote. Senate Republican Leader Bob Huff and Assembly Republican Leader Connie Conway issued the following joint statement:

“Today is just four days before the Legislature’s constitutional deadline to pass a balanced budget, yet it has been disappointing to see the majority party engage in a sham budget process.  While Democrats talk about openness and accountability, all we have seen from them are smoked-filled rooms and back-room deals, shutting out taxpayers and the news media.  Budgets thrown together behind closed doors or passed in the middle of the night are one of the main reasons why California is facing chronic deficits today.”“With the majority party crafting a budget that could harm our public schools and threaten public safety, it is imperative that it be done out in the open.  That’s why we are calling upon our Democrat colleagues to allow at least a 48-hour review period before a budget vote is taken.   The people have a right to know how the Legislature is spending their hard-earned tax dollars, and allowing a 48-hour review period will give them the chance to make their voices heard and hold their representatives accountable.”

Although Republican votes would be necessary to pass any proposed tax increases, they are no longer necessary in passing the state budget due to a ballot proposition in 2010 that allowed for a simple majority vote on the budget. Governor Brown has decided to completely sidestep Republicans on the tax issue this year by putting his $8.5 million tax hike directly before voters on November’s ballot- effectively eliminating the role of Republicans in closed door talks.

The final budget being negotiated between Governor Brown and Democratic leadership probably won’t rely heavily on accounting gimmicks- which have been favored in years past. A failure by the Legislature to deliver real numbers and cuts in the budget this year can seriously hurt the chances of Brown’s tax initiative passing in November. Such a sizeable tax increase proposal is already a hard sell on its own, and would undoubtedly suffer if the public’s distrust in the Governor’s ability to deliver a balanced budget continues to grow.

This year’s budget is also likely to be on time as promised, unless lawmakers care to lose their pay and compensation for everyday they fail to produce a balanced budget. The “no budget, no pay” aspect is yet another result of California’s ballot initiative system- voters approved the measure in 2010 in an effort to ensure that a budget is in place by the constitutional deadline.

Assembly Democrats have already released their version of the budget plan that includes a drop in the “rainy day fund” paired with smaller cuts to health and welfare programs. The proposal will be heard in committee tomorrow, and is available here: Assembly Budget Committee

A full vote is expected on Friday, but no word yet on where Governor Brown stands with the current proposal.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California Legislative Leaders Face Friday Budget Deadline

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us