Skip to content
Subscribe

As usual, California budget deficit much higher than expected

Published:

Who could have ever predicted that the projected California budget deficit for 2012-2013 would be much higher than previously assumed? Sadly, this is just the same old tired scenario.

In a desperate attempt to balance the budget, Sacramento makes hugely optimistic revenue predictions, only to have the ice water of reality thrown on it a few months later. Lawmakers then become gobsmacked when they realize they yet again need to pull more money out of the ether to make up for a gaping shortfall that no one in their right minds could have ever possibly predicted.  Then, the whole tedious process starts over again. I call it the Pixie Dust Revenue Fairy Method of balancing the budget, which returns every year on schedule without fail. If you just close your eyes and wish hard enough, then the budget will be transported to Never Never Land whereupon the revenue fairy will sprinkle it with pixie dust making it all better again.

Tragically though, the revenue fairy has joined Occupy Wall Street, leaving the California budget in its usual dismal, reality-denying situation. Governor Brown had projected a $3.1 billion deficit. A legislative memo leaked to the Sacramento Bee now has it at $5-8 billion. I feel comfortable in assuming, based on past legislative estimates, that the final deficit will be much higher – because it always is.  Based on a minor upturn in revenue several months back (which was not sustained), the governor then extrapolated that this would carry through, thus creating $4 billion more in pixie dust revenue.

But the revenue (surprise!) didn’t materialize, leaving the state open for serious and mandated budget cuts next month. These would be triggered by a $1 billion shortfall in revenue, and would be deep and painful. Some of the eternal optimists in Sacramento sunnily expect the revenue will come galloping in the door real soon now, and maybe it will. But past years have shown that the opposite usually happens. I am not reassured when their cheeriness includes the following, “Assembly aides believe that the economy has stabilized since late summer, pointing to an exceptionally strong stock market in October and an improvement in gross domestic product estimates.” I’m sorry, but on what Planet California are they residing?  Except for Silicon Valley, the California economy has not appreciably improved or stabilized. Further, while a rising stock market may benefit Wall Street and the 1%, it does little to help Main Street and the economy at large. Stock offerings and IPOs only enrich a tiny few.

What California needs is solid, realistic assessments of the budget and most of all, jobs. The months-long ritual of the budget train wreck takes valuable time away from the legislature working on lowering unemployment and spurring the economy.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

As usual, California budget deficit much higher than expected

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us