Election Security: How Trump's Executive Order Stacks Up

image
Published: 13 Sep, 2018
2 min read

On Wednesday, just two months ahead of the midterm elections, President Donald Trump signed an executive order authorizing sanctions against foreigners who meddle in U.S. elections. It addresses not only interference with campaign and election infrastructure but also propaganda efforts.

Now the responses are rolling in from Capitol Hill as the Senate struggles to roll out its own bipartisan election meddling bill, the DETER Act, introduced by Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD). Announced in July, the bill’s development has proven slower than the speed of Trump’s pen.

Bare Bones

The executive order puts into place a 90-day process to levy sanctions. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will have 45 days to assess evidence of election interference, and after that, the attorney general and the Department of Homeland Security will then have 45 days to execute sanctions.

It’s broad language, which National Security Adviser John Bolton and National Intelligence Director Dan Coats say is key.

“We do think the President has broad discretion in this area. We think it's critical for the effective conduct of American foreign and defense policy to be able to be flexible,” Bolton told reporters Wednesday.

Recently, Bolton spoke to over two dozen members of Congress about this executive order and even as the Senate struggles with the DETER Act, he received support for the administration's move because he says, “You never know how long legislation is going to take. It can take a lot longer than people think.”

The DETER Act

Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) a co-sponsor of the DETER Act, said the executive order is simply heading off legislation at the pass:

“I’m afraid this executive order is aimed more at deterring congressional action on the DETER Act than on deterring Putin’s interference in our election.”

The bill would require the Director of National Intelligence to issue Congress a report after every federal election stating whether there is a reason to believe the process was tampered with. And especially where Russia is concerned, the administration would be required to lay heavy sanctions on Russian businesses and oligarchs within 1o days -- giving the president nowhere near the amount of discretionary power.

IVP Donate

Yet after the executive order’s announcement, Rubio tweeted:

https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1039965288803000320

Making A Point…NOW?

The Trump administration says that after years of criticism for not taking foreign meddling in the 2016 US presidential election seriously enough, this is evidence that election system security is a top priority.

“We felt it was important to demonstrate that the president has taken command of this issue, that it's something he cares deeply about, that the integrity of our elections and our constitutional process are a high priority to him.  And so this order, I think, is a further demonstration of that,” said Bolton.

Two months before election day is a worryingly tight deadline.

You Might Also Like

Caution tape with US Capitol building in the background.
Did the Republicans or Democrats Start the Gerrymandering Fight?
The 2026 midterm election cycle is quickly approaching. However, there is a lingering question mark over what congressional maps will look like when voters start to cast their ballots, especially as Republicans and Democrats fight to obtain any electoral advantage possible. ...
11 Nov, 2025
-
8 min read
Utah state capitol.
Utah Judge Delivers a Major Blow to Gerrymandering
A Utah state judge has struck down the congressional map drawn by Republican lawmakers, ruling that it violates the state’s voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering and ordering new district lines for the 2026 elections....
11 Nov, 2025
-
2 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read