Election Security: How Trump's Executive Order Stacks Up

Election Security: How Trump's Executive Order Stacks Up
Published: 13 Sep, 2018
2 min read

On Wednesday, just two months ahead of the midterm elections, President Donald Trump signed an executive order authorizing sanctions against foreigners who meddle in U.S. elections. It addresses not only interference with campaign and election infrastructure but also propaganda efforts.

Now the responses are rolling in from Capitol Hill as the Senate struggles to roll out its own bipartisan election meddling bill, the DETER Act, introduced by Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD). Announced in July, the bill’s development has proven slower than the speed of Trump’s pen.

Bare Bones

The executive order puts into place a 90-day process to levy sanctions. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will have 45 days to assess evidence of election interference, and after that, the attorney general and the Department of Homeland Security will then have 45 days to execute sanctions.

It’s broad language, which National Security Adviser John Bolton and National Intelligence Director Dan Coats say is key.

“We do think the President has broad discretion in this area. We think it's critical for the effective conduct of American foreign and defense policy to be able to be flexible,” Bolton told reporters Wednesday.

Recently, Bolton spoke to over two dozen members of Congress about this executive order and even as the Senate struggles with the DETER Act, he received support for the administration's move because he says, “You never know how long legislation is going to take. It can take a lot longer than people think.”

The DETER Act

Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) a co-sponsor of the DETER Act, said the executive order is simply heading off legislation at the pass:

“I’m afraid this executive order is aimed more at deterring congressional action on the DETER Act than on deterring Putin’s interference in our election.”

The bill would require the Director of National Intelligence to issue Congress a report after every federal election stating whether there is a reason to believe the process was tampered with. And especially where Russia is concerned, the administration would be required to lay heavy sanctions on Russian businesses and oligarchs within 1o days -- giving the president nowhere near the amount of discretionary power.

IVP Donate

Yet after the executive order’s announcement, Rubio tweeted:

https://twitter.com/marcorubio/status/1039965288803000320

Making A Point…NOW?

The Trump administration says that after years of criticism for not taking foreign meddling in the 2016 US presidential election seriously enough, this is evidence that election system security is a top priority.

“We felt it was important to demonstrate that the president has taken command of this issue, that it's something he cares deeply about, that the integrity of our elections and our constitutional process are a high priority to him.  And so this order, I think, is a further demonstration of that,” said Bolton.

Two months before election day is a worryingly tight deadline.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read