Skip to content
Subscribe

Great Debate Moments That Changed Debate History

Published:

Photo: Michael Reynolds

Debates have always been an important platform for candidates to articulate and narrate their stances on the issues of the era. Like any art, particular moments in the past have defined and redirected its present form. Here are a few of these defining, great debate moments that, despite their brevity in broadcast, have not been fleeting in political memory.

The 1858 Lincoln-Douglas Debate

No one alive today was present to experience it, but the 1858 senatorial debate between Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas and Mr. Abraham Lincoln is a significant piece of debate history. Each candidate spoke at great length with subsequent, substantial rebuttals after the initial speeches. Not only has it served as a template for traditional debating since then, the format has been hailed as optimal for truly reaching the core of the issues. Some lament that today’s 90-minute format is nothing more than a superficial sparring match made for pure entertainment.

The 1960 Kennedy-Nixon Debate

Being the first televised debate, this match redefined the way new media would and could, from that point forward, influence democracy and politics. According to the Museum of Broadcast Communications, 6% of voters reported “that their vote was the result of the debates alone.” Today, the televised debates do not necessarily have the same awe-inspired influence, but the Internet will serve as the newest media medium to change democracy and politics.

The 1976 Ford-Carter Debate

After a hiatus, the debate returned to TV in 1976 and was the first in which an incumbent president participated and in which the debate series featured a vice presidential contest. Ford shocked the nation when he stated that “There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe, and there never will be under a Ford administration.” Unfortunately, the live fact checking now available on Twitter and other media platforms didn’t exist, although it was hardly necessary for this claim. The Cold War ensued (officially) for the next 13 years.

The 1980 Carter-Reagan Debate

Ronald Reagan famously said,

"Next Tuesday all of you will go to the polls, will stand there in the polling place and make a decision. I think when you make that decision, it might be well if you would ask yourself, are you better off than you were four years ago? Is it easier for you to go and buy things in the stores than it was four years ago? Is there more or less unemployment in the country than there was four years ago? Is America as respected throughout the world as it was? Do you feel that our security is as safe, that we're as strong as we were four years ago?"

This should sound eerily familiar, aside from the economic and foreign affairs parallels, because it has become an inseparable part of the modern election rhetoric paradigm.

The 1988 Bentsen-Quayle Debate that his young career was a non-issue when he said that he “ as much experience in the Congress as Jack Kennedy did when he sought the Presidency.''

Vice presidential candidates Lloyd Bentsen and Dan Quayle, senators from Texas and Indiana, engaged in heated attacks in this particular debate. Quayle, who was significantly younger than the 67-year-old Bentsen, asserted

Senator Bentsen, heavily offended, retorted “''Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you're no Jack Kennedy,” in what would become one of the most famous debate quotes of all time.

Interestingly, in the last week’s debate between Vice President Biden, 69, and Congressman Paul Ryan, 42, Biden haughtily replied to Ryan’s Kennedy tax cut comments with, “So, now you’re Jack Kennedy?”

The Future

On Thursday at IVN.us, the first ever online presidential debate between Dr. Jill Stein and Governor Gary Johnson was featured over Google Hangout. As politics move further into the digital realm, the debate might see yet another era in the age of this new media. As information is becoming more accessible, discourse and debates can only become more inclusive.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Great Debate Moments That Changed Debate History

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us