Skip to content
Subscribe

Will Entertainment Value Be The Key to Winning the 2016 Election?

Published:

If anything can possibly be said about the 2016 presidential race, it's been entertaining from both sides of the political spectrum.

On the left, there's almost a dramatic angst waiting for Hillary's final implosion (consider 2008), while Bernie Sanders keeps packing stadiums with supporters interested in his old ideas reaching newly-receptive ears.

On the right, the sheer number of Republican candidates is still making for a carnival side-show atmosphere, complete with the warm-up act from the under-card debates.

And the sponsoring networks have to be loving it, both for ratings and daily media ammunition from the campaign trail.But the general public seems to be eating up the entertainment as well, with interest in the debates over 25 percent higher than

in 2007. With almost 7-in-10 people watching at least some of the debates, this ranks as one of the most engaged races in modern politics.

But there's a twist, and a really sad one.

The same people polled were also keenly aware that the campaigning so far has had more of an entertainment quality than one of actually discussing and debating the political issues.

Could this be the the first modern presidential election won on the merits of entertainment value?

We should hope not, but there's bad news for independents and Democrats if it is -- Republicans are winning the interest battle among their ilk, with more than a three-fold increase over Democrats and independents.

There's little wonder from the independent standpoint. With no viable independent candidates, the 2016 election will likely come down to the lesser of two evils--and the independent-minded just have to patiently wait for the dust to settle to see which two less-than-hopeful candidates make it through the primary season.

The Democrats, on the other hand, will have to find some way to energize the base -- as they historically thrive in higher turnout elections.

But for now, the Republicans get to enjoy some momentum in voter interest going into 2016, something they haven't had in the past two election cycles.

While the GOP party bosses are getting fed up with the campaigning antics, they are getting the best kind of media coverage they could possibly hope for -- free public interest.

Photo Credit: Ilya B. Mirman / Shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.
Preparing the article

Will Entertainment Value Be The Key to Winning the 2016 Election?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us