Skip to content
Subscribe

While Republicans exude passion, Democrats look dull ahead of November elections

Published:

Who’s more interesting?  Sarah Palin or Barack Obama? What’s more fun to watch?  Fox News or CNN? Who’s more boring? Carly Fiorina or Barbara Boxer? If you react to these questions as I do, you’ll quickly understand why Democrats, and indeed all left of center politicians, are standing in quicksand.

The fun factor is all tilted right these days.  Fox News has been fun from the beginning.  They were the first to add sound effects to newscasts (e.g., whooshing noises when a new piece of information flies across the screen).  They were the first to recognize that Hard Copy (Bill O’Reilly’s former haunt) was serious news to many Americans.  And they were the first to realize that a good-looking host with attitude beats a good-looking host who exudes dry impartiality.

MSNBC has learned Fox’s lesson and has piled on the attitude and the entertainment value, hence improving its ratings and shoving CNN into third place.   The fact that MSNBC is doing this with a left tilt makes the network considerably less accessible than Fox.  MSNBC hosts tend to be intellectual and wonky and disdainful of those without academic bona fides (how many times does Keith Olbermann have to tell us that he’s a Cornell man?).

The Democrats these days look more like CNN than the other two, more pointed cable TV networks.  They are logical, understated, unemotional and boring.  Their wonkiness (remember Al Gore?) may cause them to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in one of their strongholds – California.

Thus far, Jerry Brown is sleep walking his way through the campaign, and Barbara Boxer seems to be waiting for the votes to come to her.  All of the excitement is on the Republican side.  Two dynamic women with name recognition, strong business backgrounds, and powerful war chests are making all the news.

And because they are opposition candidates in a Democratic state, they don’t have to tip-toe around core constituencies like unions and minorities.  They’ve got nothing to lose with the unions, and they have a substantial number of minority voters who are right of center on social issues, crime and immigration.

Brown seems like a duck out of water these days.  His oddities that were so charmingly California 30 years ago are now unattractive to the mainstream – especially when you look at the myriad problems facing the state.  Boxer is coming across as a standard politician repeating the same old platitudes that she has used over and over again.

The Republican base is excited about defeating Brown and (especially) Boxer.  The Dems have been in power so long that they’re ho-hum about this election.  So this year has turned into a very dangerous one for California’s Democratic Party.  Unless there’s a meaningful shift in the style of campaign that Brown and Boxer are running, the Republicans have a real shot at the Governorship (again), and the long-held Democratic seat in the Senate.

The good news for Dems is that it’s still early in the process and there’s plenty of time for adjustment.  It’s hard to imagine Jerry Brown changing his stripes as far as campaigning goes, but Barbara Boxer has generally been able to adjust to shifting fortunes and get the job done against the odds.

Whatever approach they take, Brown and Boxer will need to light a fire under their supporters and dampen the enthusiasm for the Republicans’ dynamic duo.  For those of us observing, let’s hope things get more interesting.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

While Republicans exude passion, Democrats look dull ahead of November elections

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us