Skip to content
Subscribe

Study: Where Californians Stand on Environmental Issues

Published:

Credit: heatingoil.com

Environmental issues expand beyond the debate on global warming. Important components to the issue include air pollution, energy policy, and methods to curtail the output by emitters. The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) conducted a comprehensive survey which detailed Californians' stances on environmental issues. The survey can be found here in its entirety.

The survey delves into government ratings, policy preferences, and regional differences as well as party stances regarding environmental policy. The centerpiece for environmental policy in California is Assembly Bill 32 (AB32). AB32 is a comprehensive law established in 2006 to reduce the state's greenhouse gas emissions.

One original feature of the law is the cap-and-trade system. The system sets emissions caps for companies and must be complied with by January 2013. The trade component allows those under the cap to auction the remaining emissions to others wishing to go beyond the cap. Auctioning emission permits will begin in November of this year.

While this brand-new law is set in motion very soon, 57% of Californians are unaware of cap-and-trade. When respondents were briefed on the cap-and-trade system, 53% were in favor. Along party lines, support from Independents/Democrats/Republicans are at 44/55/32 percent.

The theory behind cap-and-trade to reduce emissions is not only in the cap. By requiring emission permits to be bought, it is supposed to motivate companies to look for more cost-effective ways to comply with the cap. There is concern that companies in low-income areas will be the main buyer of permits. If this is the case, environmental conditions might worsen disproportionately. Forty-eight percent of Californians believe the cap-and-trade system will do so.

Every environmental issue is interconnected and air pollution is a large problem in the eyes of Californians. The survey reports that 64% see air pollution as a problem and 49% say that it poses  serious health risks. This shouldn't be a surprise. California alone ranked 17th in global green house gas emissions in 2006. As for policy solutions, 65% support stricter emission standards on passenger vehicles. While the support is a majority, PPIC says it's the lowest since they began surveying. Stricter emission standards on diesel fueled vehicles and commercial/industrial activity saw higher support at around 70 percent.

"California’s likely voters trust Obama over Romney on global warming policy by a wide margin—even though a majority also say that the federal government is not doing enough to address this issue," President and CEO of PPIC Mark Baldassare concluded.

Of the Independents surveyed, 53% favor President Obama and 37% supported Governor Romney for the 2012 Presidential election. Only 1% of Independents surveyed are looking to support a third-party candidate. In the survey's totality, 51% favor President Obama and 40% favor Governor Romney. The gap widens when asked who to trust on environmental issues alone, showing a 54 versus 33 percent respectively.

Governor of California Jerry Brown was also factored into the survey. Brown's overall approval rating and environmental work approval are at 42% and 39% respectively. Brown is a strong activist on environmental issues and his long record can be found on his official website

This is only scratching the surface on California environmental issues. PPIC provides detailed analysis of their many findings and the survey will help dig deeper into the environmental issues of California and the country.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Study: Where Californians Stand on Environmental Issues

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us