Skip to content
Subscribe

The unreality of California budget negotiations

Published:

Gov. Brown's "concessions" from public unions have, as usual in the convoluted, interminable, and deeply opaque process by which California eventually stumbles to a budget agreement, turned out to be less of a cut than what state employees are experiencing under their current expired contract.  But since it's less than what they would have received under a mythical no budget cut situation, it counts as a decrease even though state employees will actually be making more. Ouch, this makes my brain hurt, make it stop.

Currently, most employees have an effective 15% pay cut because of three unpaid furlough days per month. Under Gov. Brown's proposal, their pay cut will amount to 10%. Yet somehow, in the fantasy world of California budget speak, this amounts to a pay cut rather than a marginal increase.  What's worse, after all this effort, the supposed savings will be a hundred million or so. This is a rounding error in the current deficit of $15.6 billion.

A cousin is a sales tax auditor for California. She works hard, is nowhere close to being overpaid, and struggles to get by like many others.  Can you imagine working in an environment where your pay and hours are always changing while many on the outside assume you're wallowing at the public trough? I'm sure morale at state agencies must just be soaring now. The problem isn't the employees but an utterly dysfunctional legislative process that is incapable of accomplishing timely and rational decisions on budget matters, as well as being beholden to various corporate and union interests.

The Republicans are as adrift as the Democrats, castaways from the Land of Logic, with their magical belief that by saying the budget can be balanced without tax increases, this automatically makes it so. Reality is not permitted to intrude.

Let's parse Gov. Brown's state labor proposals, shall we? The text in italics is from the Sacramento Bee.

Workers pay more toward their pensions, but top-step employees get an offsetting raise in two years on the contracts' last day.

Translation: The top cats are immune from all this nonsense because they cut themselves a special deal.

Two paid holidays are erased from the state calendar, but they're replaced by two floating paid days off.

How does replacing two days of vacation with two days of vacation save money?

The contracts call for 12 unpaid days off spread over a year but end the three-day-per-month furlough program in place since early 2009.

How does replacing 36 furlough days a year with 12 furlough days a year save money?

The deals also lower pension benefits for new hires, but that change won't appreciably affect the state budget for many years.

Translation: We'll dropkick the problem down the road a few years and pretend we've done something about it now.

This is all just smoke and mirrors, which at best will result in a tiny savings compared to the massive size of the deficit. Nothing has changed with the new Brown Administration. A sense of unreality still pervades Sacramento.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The unreality of California budget negotiations

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us