Skip to content
Subscribe

The DC Council Has One More Chance to Let Independents Vote. Now is the Time to Get it Done!

These are taxpayer-funded elections. Every voter should be able to cast a ballot. It is time to fund implementation of semi-open primaries.

Government of the District of Columbia. The DC Council has one more chance to fund open primaries.
Image: B Christopher on Alamy. Image license obtained and used exclusively by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths.
Published:

History isn’t only about what’s happened in the past. We make history as we move through our daily lives. And that’s what’s happening right here, right now in Washington, DC. 

Yes! We made history on Tuesday, June 16 when, in the primary elections, ranked choice voting was used in DC for the first time ever. This means that, when those who go on to hold office in January 2027, they will have been approved with support of the majority of voters. 

DC’s Democratic primary is a fait accompli for all but one contest on the general election ballot which follows in November. For the DC Council and mayoral contests, this primary was the definitive election. 

How did this change come about? My name is Lisa Rice. I am a native Washingtonian, current District resident, and passionate democracy reformer. I care about this democracy of ours, as frayed as it is, and believe our path to restoration will only be successful when we put voters first. 

In 2023, I proposed a change to our election system here in DC. Initiative 83 combined two powerful voter-centric reforms – ranked choice voting and semi-open primaries. It won in November 2024 with 73% of the vote. We the people made a law!!  

When it came to funding, the Council chose to break apart the two elements and in 2025 appropriated funds in the FY26 budget only for the implementation of ranked choice voting, leaving semi-open primaries out in the cold. 

That was then. This is now. And we’re turning up the heat!

The Council is working through the FY27 budget, with a final vote scheduled for Tuesday, June 23. This is their opportunity to do the right thing and appropriate funds for semi-open primaries, to let independents vote.

For a total cost of just $1.1 million in a $21.2 billion budget, the cost to fund semi-open primaries is a rounding error. I’ll put it into even sharper focus. For $0.40 per resident, this can be funded. 

That’s half the cost of a postage stamp. C’mon now! Let’s get real, this isn’t about money, it’s about political will. 

DC Says Democracy Costs Too Much. Its Budget Says Otherwise.
The DC Council says open primaries are too expensive, but the city’s budget shows the real issue isn’t the price tag — it’s whether independent voters are a priority.

In an era of mass dilution of voting rights, I'm still mourning the Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision to gut the Voting Rights Act, which quickly opened the door to a wave of redistricting laws across the country to disenfranchise people of color. 

Nationally, Democrats decried these measures. And yet the DC State Democratic Committee tried everything in its power to keep me from voting. The irony of that is sickening.  

While rank and file Democrats stood strongly behind Initiative 83 – this is, after all, a voting rights issue – the party leadership led opposition to these changes. But they lost. A recent court decision once again rejected their lawsuit. 

We should celebrate this rare victory for voter enfranchisement by making those reforms a reality.  

Tuesday’s primary results, though not yet official, show there is a leadership change on the horizon. And many of those about to assume leadership of the DC Democratic State Committee are supporters of these policy changes.

If his numbers hold, the Committee’s next National Committeeman will be Philip Pannell, the treasurer of the Initiative 83 campaign. Philip has joined me in my efforts to persuade the DC Council to fund semi-open primaries.

Just a couple of days ago he said, “I strongly believe DC’s current closed primary system is a form of political exclusion, electoral segregation and voter suppression.” 

With new party leadership about to take charge, I believe the political will I mentioned earlier may find new resolve. I’m not a partisan, but I’m pretty sure that with opposition walking out the door, it will be an easier political path for those who were hesitant to support funding to now find their way to voting yes to fund semi-open primaries. 

These are taxpayer-funded elections. Every voter should be able to cast a ballot. It is time to fund implementation of semi-open primaries. Now. Just get it done! 

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The DC Council Has One More Chance to Let Independents Vote. Now is the Time to Get it Done!

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us