Skip to content
Subscribe

Technology in Education Can Overcome Writing Deficiencies it Created

Published:
Technology in Education Can Overcome Writing Deficiencies it Created

Credit: Monkey Business Images / Shutterstock.com

A perpetual discussion in education policy is the role of tech tools in the classroom. Some districts invest in technology through costly bond measures. Some schools have made it work and have integrated tech well into instruction.

A study done by the Pew Research Center revealed that while digital tools in education can complement instruction, it has also shaped what needs to be taught in writing. Teachers still value the art of formal writing and tech-minded students may have new ways to think critically. But a generation growing up with the informalities of social networking and text messages presents new challenges for instruction.

The most important findings that highlighted the benefits of digital tools and teaching reveal:

1) 96% agree (including 52% who strongly agree) that digital technologies “allow students to share their work with a wider and more varied audience”2) 79% agree (23% strongly agree) that these tools “encourage greater collaboration among students”3) 78% agree (26% strongly agree) that digital technologies “encourage student creativity and personal expression”

However, carelessness and informalities permeate the educational realm as student grow up with new tech:

1) 68% say that digital tools make students more likely—as opposed to less likely or having no impact—to take shortcuts and not put effort into their writing2) 46% say these tools make students more likely to “write too fast and be careless”3) Yet, while 40% say today’s digital technologies make students more likely to “use poor spelling and grammar” another 38% say they make students LESS likely to do this Source: The Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project Online
Technology in Education Can Overcome Writing Deficiencies it Created

Pew's study is rooted in a survey of teachers based on a non-representative sample of 2,067 middle and high school teachers.

Pew's research sheds new light to the debate on the changing role of teachers with technological advances. Much of the conversations cover how online courses could replace college professors or how investing in tech tools have changed school budget priorities. Added to the discussion will be how not only does tech overcome academic deficiencies, but how it also creates new ones.

(The entire Pew study "Impact of Digital Tools on Student Writing and How Writing is Taught in Schools" can be read and downloaded here.)

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Technology in Education Can Overcome Writing Deficiencies it Created

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us