Skip to content
Subscribe

Survey Shows May 19 Propositions in Deep Trouble

By Indy
Published:

SANFRANCISCO -- Despite the state's airwaves being plastered by TVcommercials showing firefighters and teachers predicting furthereconomic disaster for California should Props. 1A through 1F fail, amajority of likely voters in a poll say they will vote against atleast five of measures during the upcoming May 19 special election.
                     
       The poll, conducted by the San Francisco-based Public Policy Institute of California,was released late Thursday evening and showed that Props. 1A through 1Ewere headed for likely defeat. Only Prop. 1F, which prevents lawmakersfrom getting salary increases during years when the state budget is indeficit, appeared headed toward passage.
       
The ballotinitiatives -- the product of a last-minute deal by ranking Democratsto secure enough Republican votes to pass a months-late state budget --seemed doomed to failure almost from the start, polls showed. And whilethe governor and leading Democratic and Republican leaders have allconsistently urged voters to pass the measures, independent civicgroups, labor unions and political wings of both parties have spokenout against the initiatives.
       
"The voters who are really tuned in are really turned off. They see thestate's budget situation as a big problem, but so far, they don't likethe solution," said Mark Baldessare, PPIC's president and CEO."Proposition 1C is the measure that matters most for next year'sbudget, and it's in the most trouble."
       
       Specifically, the PPIC poll shows:
       
--Prop. 1A / Rainy day budget. (52% no, 35% yes, 13% don't know):Democrats (47%) are much more likely than independents (32%) and morethan twice as likely as Republicans (22%) to support the measure. Just7 percent say Proposition 1A would be very effective in avoiding futurebudget deficits, and 32 percent say it would be somewhat effective.Latinos are more likely (45%) than whites (32%) to favor the measure.
       
--Prop. 1B / Payments to school districts. (47% no, 40% yes, 13% don'tknow): More voters oppose than support this measure to require a futurepayment of $9.3 billion to local school districts and communitycolleges. Those who are very closely following election news areopposed, 61 percent to 32 percent. A majority of Democrats (53%) wouldvote yes and a majority of Republicans (61%) would vote no. Support forthe measure falls short of a majority in all of the state's majorregions. Latinos offer more support (56%) than whites (34%).
       
--Prop. 1C / California lottery modernization. (58% no, 32% yes, 10%don't know): A solid majority oppose this measure, which wouldmodernize the lottery and allow the state to borrow $5 billion fromfuture profits to help balance the 2009-2010 budget. Opposition is evenstronger among voters who are following election news closely (65% no,29% yes). Majorities in all regions say they'll vote no, while whites(63%) are more likely than Latinos (42%) to say they will vote no.
       
--Prop. 1D / Removes early childhood education funds. (45% no, 43% yes,12% don't know): Voters are divided on this measure that wouldtemporarily transfer funds from early childhood education programs tohelp balance the state budget. A majority of Democrats (54%) supportthe measure, and a majority of Republicans (56%) oppose it. Opponents(49%) outnumber supporters (39%) among independents. A majority ofthose following election news very closely are opposed (57% no, 35%yes). Latinos (66%) are much more likely than whites (36%) to be infavor.
       
--Prop. 1E / Removes money from mental health programs. (48% no, 41%yes, 11% don't know): More voters oppose than support this measure totransfer money from mental health services to the general fund to helpbalance the state budget. Support falls short of a majority acrossmajor regions of the state. A majority of Latinos (63%) would vote yes,while most whites (54%) would vote no. Voters who are very closelyfollowing election news oppose Proposition 1E by a wider margin (61%no, 35% yes).
       
--Prop. 1F / Prevents lawmakers from getting raises during deficityears. (73% yes, 24% no, 3% don't know): Although support for themeasure has slipped, at least two in three voters across all thestate's major regions and strong majorities across demographic groupssay they would vote yes. Among those closely following the election, 62percent would vote yes and 36 would vote no.
       
The poll results were embargoed by PPIC until 10 p.m.  last Thursday. At thatminute political reporters across the state began receiving e-mailsfrom the governor's California Budget Reform Now campaign,which has been leading the charge to get the measures passed. Thee-mail and the wall-to-wall TV advertising confirm the politicalcapital that's been placed on the line with these troubled measures.                  
                         In last Thursday night's e-mail, California Budget Reform Now called on Jeannine English, state president of the American Association of Retired Persons to herald the potential doom if Props. 1A through 1F fail at the polls.
         
"While voters are frustrated, they are starting to recognize that it isour children, public safety officers, older citizens, firefighters andthe most vulnerable among us who will suffer the most should thesemeasures fail, not the politicians in Sacramento. We will be workingday and night to communicate to voters in the coming weeks thatsupporting Props 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E and 1F is a vote to prevent thesedeep cuts and take a step toward improving the state's fiscalsituation...." English said in a statement.

The poll was based on a telephone survey of 2,005 adult Californiansfrom April 27-May 4. The margin of error for all respondents is plus orminus 2 percent. The error rate for the 1,080 likely voters polled isplus or minus 3 percent.

Follow Jeff Mitchell's political journalism at BAPolitix.org

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Survey Shows May 19 Propositions in Deep Trouble

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us