Skip to content
Subscribe

Super PAC Money Has Been Flowing Freely to Grab Last Voters

Published:

Mitt Romney has been appealing to four blue-leaning states much more aggressively this week, launching ads totaling $1.8 million in Minnesota and New Mexico this past Wednesday. In an attempt to “buy” the traditionally Democratic states, the pro-Romney Super PAC Restore Our Future has been dumping money into advertising in these crucial states. PAC and Super PAC money has been flowing freely in a last minute attempt to gain with undecided voters.

In a tit-for-tat of funding, every state in which the Romney campaign infuses cash, Obama support follows suit, and vice-versa.

According to opensecrets.org, the super PAC Restore Our Future has raised a total of $131,692,123 in support of Romney. In comparison, the highest fundraising PAC for Obama, Priorities USA, has raised $63,897,639, less than half of Restore Our Future.

Both the Romney and Obama campaigns are trying to garner last minute support throughout the country. The Romney campaign held two separate fundraising events in Michigan in October. Romney was not in attendance, but Ann Romney and VP candidate Paul Ryan stood in.  The Obama campaign held no events in Michigan, but the first fady was campaigning for the president in the state, as he was working on Sandy relief efforts on the East Coast.

This last push for support might be too late in the campaign cycle; as of November 2, one third of voters in swing states will have already cast their ballots. The states most in question now are: Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, Florida, Virginia, Wisconsin, and of course, Ohio. In these states, nearly 32 percent voters say they have already cast their vote.

The Rasmussen Reports Daily Presidential Tracking Poll for November 2 shows the race tied, with President Obama and Governor Romney attracting support from 48 percent of voters nationwide. One percent prefers some other candidate, and three percent remain undecided. November 2 Ramussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll credit:ramussenreports.com

Ramussen Report November 2

The Washington Post released a preliminary electoral vote count on November 2 as well. This poll shows President Obama leading with 186 "solid" electoral votes, compared to Romney's 170 "solid" electoral votes. The poll further shows that 51 electorates are leaning towards Obama, while 36 are swayed in Romney's direction. Ninety-five are still considered a "toss up."

It would seem that Governor Romney's elevated outside spending, as compared to President Obama, would reflect a significant gap between the two candidates.  However, as it stands now, this is an exceptionally close race, so it will not be surprising to see PACs and super PACs supporting either kicking into higher gear, even in the race's last two days.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Super PAC Money Has Been Flowing Freely to Grab Last Voters

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us