Skip to content
Subscribe

Step Aside, Florida. It's California's Turn.

By Indy
Published:

There'snot nearly as much housing help as the $4 billion the BushAdministration deliveredin September. Of the $731million President Obama handed out this time, though, at least California got thelion's share.

Bothrounds were part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's NeighborhoodStabilization Program; Thursday's funding was part of this year'sstimulus bill. The program was created last year to help states and some localcommunities buy, renovate, sell or develop foreclosed or abandoned homes.

The newround, which Obama announced Thursday during a trip to California, includes $145 million forstatewide programs.

An additional $21.7 million goes to local governments, much of that to the City of Modestoand Stanislaus Countyin the hard-hit Central Valley. It's probablynot mere coincidence that the $15.7 million infusion of stimulus money helpsgive Blue Dog Rep. Dennis Cardoza politicalcover in the core of his district.

The moneyis no political gift, though. According to February statistics from RealtyTrac, Modesto's foreclosure rate is thefourth-highest in the nation. Californiacontinues to lead the states, with foreclosures increasing 51 percent over theprevious year and 5 percent over the previous month.

It's nicethat an administration finally recognizes those statistics.

InSeptember, HUD data evaluated California's risk that homes would be abandonedas "low" and Florida's as "medium" in deciding to awardFlorida $541 million and California $529 million.

Californiaofficials were baffled and outraged.

"Frankly, it is beyond us how California-- which has nearly twice the amount of foreclosure filings than Florida -- could receiveless assistance. This makes no sense, and is totally unacceptable," Sens.Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer wrote then-HUD Secretary Steve Preston.

TheSeptember calculations for "abandonment risk" were based on U.S.Postal Service vacancy information and federal data on high-riskloans. The scores did yield interesting results.

Alabama, with only a 3.6 percent foreclosure rate over the 18months previous, was considered a "high" abandonment risk, while California, with a 6.7percent foreclosure rate, was deemed a "low" risk.  Florida's foreclosure rate was placed at 8 percent - the California senatorsdispute that figure, which was based on  Mortgage Bankers AssociationNational Delinquency Survey and not actual filings - and called a"medium" risk.

Criticismof the program didn't end with concerns about the formula. Since the firstround was delivered, concerns have popped up in many states about lack ofguidelines for how the money should be spent.

Inclassic examples of NIMBY-ism that balks when neighborhoods shift away fromowner-occupied, some people have said they'd rather see abandonedproperties razed than rented.

It probably won't allay NIMBY concerns, but HUD doesallow the money to be used to help low and moderate income buyers with down payments andclosing costs.

There's also a provision to prevent subprime-loanshivers from running down you spine: All buyers receiving help will have toundergo financial counseling, and the financing must be from an institution that agreesto follow sound lending practices.

The lessthan $700 million Californiahas received in both rounds is a drop in the bucket when it comes to solvingthe state's foreclosure crisis. But it at least offers some hope to people whowould like to see their neighborhoods look less like ghost towns.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Step Aside, Florida. It's California's Turn.

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us