Skip to content

South Carolina Judge Says GOP Can Deny Voters Primary; Trump Considers Ditching Debates

South Carolina Judge Says GOP Can Deny Voters Primary; Trump Considers Ditching Debates
Published:

A South Carolina judge last week dismissed a lawsuit against the state’s Republican Party over its decision to cancel a 2020 presidential primary. The decision all but ensures that many of the state’s voters will not have a say in the presidential process.

In her opinion, Richland Circuit Court Judge Jocelyn Newman wrote that the plaintiffs, among whom includes former US Rep Robert Durden Inglis, did not have “a legal right to a presidential preference primary, and the Court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the General Assembly or the SCGOP.”

In other words, the party makes the rules, even at the expense of voter choice.

The South Carolina GOP was one of 4 Republican Parties that decided in September to forgo a presidential preference primary in 2020. The decision has been condemned by President Donald Trump’s 3 challengers in the race, which includes former South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford.

Many Republican Parties have changed their rules in one way or another to make it much more challenging for Sanford, former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld, and former Illinois US Rep. Joe Walsh to pick up any delegates or challenge Trump for the nomination at the Republican National Convention.

Further, not only has Trump and the Republican Party refused primary debates, but the president is reportedly considering not even showing for the general election debates. The New York Times reports that he has told advisors that he has “misgivings” about the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD).


The CPD was formed as a partnership between the Republican and Democratic Parties, and sponsors all of the debates in presidential general elections. Since the commission’s rules make it all but impossible for third party and independent candidates to gain access, a decision not to participate by the president would mean no debates at all.

Follow the lawsuit against the CPD.

An ongoing lawsuit in federal court is challenging the CPD’s rules that block even a single additional candidate outside the Republican and Democratic Parties from appearing on the debate stage. If nothing changes, however, it will be another year in which the major parties have denied voters a real choice in presidential elections.

Shawn Griffiths

Shawn Griffiths

Shawn is an election reform expert and National Editor of IVN.us. He studied history and philosophy at the University of North Texas. He joined the IVN team in 2012.

IVN is rated Center by AllSides and High Credibility by MBFC — follow our independent journalism in your feed.

Add IVN on Google

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.