Skip to content
Subscribe

Schwarzenegger blasts Republicans for trying to block pension reform

Published:

You read that headline right. In his weekly radio address on Saturday, Gov. Schwarzenegger said Republican legislators tried to block badly needed public pension reform. The reason for this seemed to be because they were getting large contributions from the prison guards union. He said he expected Democrats to oppose pension reform because "most Democrats are in bed with labor", but what he did not expect was that the bill would initially fail because a few Republicans, from "the group who rails against government spending," specifically opposed the bill.

Further, he said those legislators have accepted more than $75,000 from the prison guards union. "Now normally you get $1,000 or $500 or a $2,000 contribution. But $75,000? Why did they give them all this money? Maybe to fight against the pension reforms.  Maybe. You figure it out."

In a genuinely sleazy and cynical move, the governor says several of those Republicans changed their vote afterward so the official record wouldn't show they sided with unions. "Not only did they try to block reform, but then they did not even have the courage to publicly stand behind their action."

Why is changing your vote like this even permissible? This is this opposite of transparency, and precisely what California doesn't need. But, it appears our state political system is awash in campaign contribution money and that legislators can pretend to be what they are not. This certainly gives the impression that votes are for sale to the highest bidder.

Schwarzenegger got the bill passed by calling a special session of the legislature, which required getting a signature from Secretary of State Bowen at 3 AM. He has been steadfast in working towards pension reform, and has stood his ground on this while those around him crawled, something other politicians might consider doing too.

Look, everyone wants to have a nice pension and certainly what prison guards do can be dangerous. But the simple, if politically unpopular truth, is that California cannot afford the public pensions it is paying for. Schwarzenegger's bill is a step in the right direction, but California's unfunded pension liability reaches into the hundreds of billions. This problem will not go away by pretending it's not there, or by the legislature catering to special interests above that of the state as a whole.

Schwarzenegger will be out of office soon. So he can be blunt (and certainly was!). He was saying that our entire political process at the state level is compromised by too many lobbyists and too much cash. We should heed what he said. Then take action.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Schwarzenegger blasts Republicans for trying to block pension reform

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us