Skip to content
Subscribe

San Francisco city planners surfed porn at work

Published:

Amid the fallout after Californians discovered that Bell City Manager Robert Rizzo earned nearly $800,000 a year, and would receive an extravagant $600,000 a year pension upon retirement, golden state residents everywhere are alarmed.

With the state and most local governments facing a desperate financial crisis, Californians are outraged at anything they perceive as a wasteful use of the state's resources by privileged government bureaucrats.

That's what made the bizarre pornographic images unearthed by SF Weekly Tuesday all the more shocking.

It all started last December when someone at San Francisco's Planning Deparment blew the whistle on a workplace culture that permitted the regular exchange of pornographic emails among workers on city computers and on city time.

That means San Francisco's residents were unwittingly paying government workers to spend their time exchanging and looking at porn.

The planning department's website says that it:

"develops planning policy to preserve and enhance San Francisco's quality of life. Citywide Policy Planning maintains the city's General Plan which provides guidance to all city agencies and departments regarding urban design, land use, transportation, housing, open space and a variety of other issues."

One of the five senior staff members to lose their jobs over the course of the investigation, a veteran Zoning Administrator by the name of Larry Badiner- made over $150,000 a year.

The ongoing scandal made headlines again this week when SF Weekly published some of its findings after making a public records request for the material that resulted in the firings.

Among other offensive and graphic materials, San Francisco's government employees were apparently exchanging photographs of a nude man with a chain saw... and a hula hoop.

While some readers found the story amusing (one commentator wrote: "LOL, thats just too funny dude. Seriously."), this is no laughing matter.

Years of pornography use during working hours on the taxpayers' dime in the middle of an economic downturn is not only an egregious waste of scarce resources, it's a form of sexual harrassment that creates a hostile work environment.

Navarette Law Firm, a company that specializes in sexual harrassment cases with offices in San Francisco and San Jose, says that it is considered workplace sexual harrassment if someone has porn visible on their screen, tells sexual jokes, or sends e-mails of a sexual nature.

With this and many other recent examples of malfeasance by California's bureaucrats, residents of the Golden State must grapple with questions about and solutions to a culture of corruption and privilege in its vast public sector.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

San Francisco city planners surfed porn at work

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us