Skip to content
Subscribe

Rising Tiger? Economic Questions Plague Chinese Timber Giant

Published:
sino_forest_corp

Chinese timber giant, Sino-Forest Corp, has filed for bankruptcy protection on March 31st, 2012. The company has been under investigation for allegedly exaggerating its timber holdings in China, essentially defrauding investors of their money. The company has put itself up for sale and is suing the research firm making these serious allegations. They are also under investigation by the Canadian national police force, and are being sued by their investors for fraud. Sino-Forest says it will attempt to restructure itself, if no suitable take over options emerge.This firm is just one example of fraudulent Chinese business practices that leaves the integrity of the Chinese economy in question. If analysts don't have a clear understanding of how things operate in the Chinese economy, how can the Chinese leaders make decisions based on what's there, when there is much deception about what is there.Frankly, it throws the whole idea of Chinese usurpation of the West into question. If most of the growth that's actually projected in China, is actually exaggerated growth that's not actually solid, how can they actually be catching up with us? This is only plausible if you consider the American economy to be sliding backward towards Chinese levels, as a result of our own economic follies and foibles.

Just how substantial is the field of economics if, at present, theories bandied about in such prestigious economic institutions like Chicago University, are leading to misrepresentation and misinterpretations of facts on the ground. Have these theories been actually linked to economic health and well being for life on this planet?

These are fundamental questions to ask when seriously attempting to getting our economy back on track, by correcting some of the mistakes in academia which got us here in the first place.

In light of all that's happened in the past thirty years, how do we continue to allow for fraud, deception and false reckonings of reality in our economic markets and, more significantly, in our economic policies? Bearing in mind, even a free market policy is just a policy set by the governing body of the state. So, how beneficial are these theories and practices in real life? How do our policy choices help or hurt us, in terms of socioeconomic conditions?

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Rising Tiger? Economic Questions Plague Chinese Timber Giant

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us