Skip to content
Subscribe

7 Important Revisions to Education Funding in CA You May Have Missed

Published:

Credit: newamericamedia.org

7 Highlights from California Revised Budget for Education

As soon as Governor Brown released the May revision of the California 2013-2014 budget, analysts and experts were all over it. With regards to education funding, much of what had to be said about the budget has already been said. In case anything was missed, here are seven highlights concerning the state's classrooms from the May revise.

1.  Brown's K-12 funding formula remains unchanged at its core

The local control funding formula (LCFF) remained the same as far as how state funding will be delegated to school districts. LCFF emphasizes extra funding for districts with higher numbers of disadvantaged (low-income, English-learning) students. Brown is relentless in his support for the formula, despite concerns from opposition and Senate Democrats who say it creates funding inequities.

(Details on the local control funding formula can be found here.)

2. Modified accountability measures and overall funding increased

Minor changes in the May revise contain an extra $240 million to implement LCFF in its first year and increase accountability measures. In a media call following the budget announcement, Karen Stapf Walters, executive director of the State Board of Education, said:

"We've set up a process to keep accountability as local as possible. County Superintendents will be asked to review those plans to make sure the plans reflect what's actually happening on the local level."

County superintendents can also call for a third party to conduct a program review if issues with plans are not resolved. This can be taken up to the state superintendent, but only in rare situations.

3. Senate Bill 69 must still be considered

Senate Bill 69 wants to do away with concentration grants and use that money to raise base grant levels. However, concentration grants would only make up 4 percent of overall K-12 funding. Brown has stated that the Senate proposal would spread those resources too thin.

When asked how these differences can be reconciled, Director Walters responded, "time will tell."

4. Brown endorses Common Core with a $1 billion push

New to the May revise is a $1 billion investment for school districts to improve the implementation of Common Core State Standards. This equates to about $170 extra per-student. Walters explained what districts can actually do with the money:

"It goes out very flexibly to school districts for anything around Common Core whether it's professional development, technology needs, instructional materials. We think it's a very good beginning down the right track."

It was also stated that accountability measures for Common Core funds will be similar to the measures used for LCFF.

5. Better days ahead for Community Colleges

The California Community College system has a $226.9 million increase in funding over the initial budget proposal. The increased funding is allocated for the following:

1) $87.5 million for a cost of living adjustment; 2) $89.4 million available for general apportionment growth; 3) $50 million for additional student support services including orientation, assessments, counseling, advising, and educational planning

The $50 million for matriculation was included to address the recommendations of the Student Success Act of 2012.

6. K-12 Deferrals payments accelerated

About $2.5 billion over two years will be dedicated to accelerating the process of paying K-12 deferrals. These are payments the state needs to make to schools to make up for past cuts.

"Total funding over the two-year period will reduce K-12 inter-year deferrals to $4.9 billion by the end of the 2013-2014 fiscal year, representing an almost $600 million net reduction to outstanding deferrals over the two-year period."
7. Brown changes adult education plan; no mention of early childhood education

The governor revoked his plan to put $300 million into community colleges for the purpose of taking on adult education entirely. Instead, the revised budget maintains the status quo for two years and puts $50 million into planning better partnerships between community colleges and school districts. About $500 in total will be put into adult education by 2015-2016.

Much like the initial budget proposal, there are no mentions of early childhood education programs or funding coming from the state.

Are there any highlights from the California revised budget for education that were missed? Let us know in the comments.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

7 Important Revisions to Education Funding in CA You May Have Missed

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us