Skip to content
Subscribe

Pro-Business Legislative Efforts Bear Little Fruit

Published:
small-business-tax-cut

House Republicans and Senate Democrats are offering dueling tax cut bills for small businesses, and “neither has a snowball’s chance in hell of being passed,” according to Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who in 2008 advised Republican presidential candidate John McCain on economic policy.

Each bill is intended to energize job creation by small businesses; however, they take distinctly different approaches.  The Republican Bill (also known as the Small Business Tax Cut Act of 2012, or H.R. 9) provides a 20 percent across-the-board cut in the form of a tax credit to any business with fewer than 500 employees.  The companies receiving the tax break are not required to take any specific actions such as hiring staff or making capital investments in return.

Republicans view such requirements as treading in territory that rightly belongs to the business owners.

“What the bill will do is it - bottom line - will put more revenues, more money into the hands of small business owners so that they can reinvest those funds to retain and create more jobs and to grow their business. Plain and simple,” said Eric Cantor, House Majority Leader, in his introduction of the bill.

The Fiscal Times calls this bill a “tax break that favors the rich,” because 49 percent of the benefits will accrue to people with gross incomes of $1 million or more.

Additionally, the Fiscal Times reports, the impact on job development is minimal:

“According to a Treasury study, the bulk of small businesses don’t have any employees at all. Of 19 million such businesses in 2007, fewer than 5 million had employees. Many are what are called pass-through entities that exist largely on paper as tax avoidance devices for the wealthy,” wrote former Reagan economic advisor Bruce Bartlett in the web magazine.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office agrees that the bill will do little to stimulate new employment, but notes that it will add substantially to the deficit, at a cost of at least $46 billion.

H.R. 9 passed the House Ways and Means Committee last week on a party-line vote.  And while it is expected to win the day in the Republican controlled House, it has little chance to succeed in the Democratic controlled Senate.

According to Bloomberg BusinessWeek, “Democrats on the panel criticized the bill for not tying the tax break to hiring or investment, and their objections signaled that the measure may not fare well in the Democratic- controlled Senate as currently written.”

The Democratic proposal provides a 10 percent tax cut for those small businesses that expand their payroll.  The Senate bill would also revive for 2012 the ability of companies to write off 100 percent of capital investments.

"The House Republican proposal is neither focused on true small businesses, nor does it make the tax cut dependent at all on the company doing any hiring," said Senator Charles Schumer (D-NY).

But tax experts argue that the Senate bill is too complex to administer.  “Some of the firms that get a tax break here would be firms that would have increased their payroll anyway,” said Alan Viard, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington group that favors strengthening free enterprise.

The Democratic bill comes with a $26 billion price tag, and is called a “temporary tax cut” by its sponsors.  The Republican bill is a one-year measure as well.

Meanwhile, the Senate last week blocked an attempt by Democrats to eliminate tax credits for oil companies that are designed to encourage development of new energy resources.

“Right now, the biggest oil companies are raking in record profits,” President Obama said defending the bill. “On top of these record profits, oil companies are also getting billions a year in taxpayer subsidies.”

Republicans saw it differently, defending the bill’s defeat as an effort to keep incentives in place that would result in more drilling and more oil available in the United States.

In response to Democratic efforts to end the subsidies, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said, “Their brilliant plan on how to deal with gas prices: raise taxes on energy companies.”

Three tax-related bills for business with zero results.  Your tax dollars at work.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Pro-Business Legislative Efforts Bear Little Fruit

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us