Solyndra bankruptcy and its inevitable impact on California renewable energy

Solyndra bankruptcy and its inevitable impact on California renewable energy
Published: 26 Sep, 2011
2 min read

Solyndra executives, CEO Brian Harrison and CFO Bill Stover, were pummeled in a Congressional hearing last Friday, mostly by Republicans who wanted to know what happened to the $528 million in federal loan money and why the loans were made subordinate to a $75 million private loan. Democrats were also unhappy.

Rep. Diana DeGette from Colorado echoed a common sentiment, wondering how the CEO could have met with her and others in July, say everything was fine "and declare bankruptcy five weeks later." Texas Republican Joe Barton was more blunt. He asked, "How does a company go from having the president of the United States visit it to having the F.B.I. come in and confiscate its files?"

Both executives refused to answer any questions, invoking their constitutional right against self-incrimination by taking the Fifth Amendment.  They said they did so at the advice of their lawyers. While this is certainly legal and even understandable, it certainly doesn't help their cause in the court of public opinion. Republicans threw so many hostile accusations at them that Democrat Henry Waxman finally complained, in effect saying this was like punching someone who couldn't punch back. But still, there are many unanswered questions.

Repercussions from the Solyndra bankruptcy are already being felt. Solar industry giant First Solar said it will not meet a Sept. 30 deadline to complete Department of Energy requirements for a $1.93 billion loan for a 550 MW solar plant in San Luis Obispo County.   The company said DOE requirements were more onerous than private loans. However, a UBS analyst said the Solyndra bankruptcy was one reason for this. Perhaps another reason is First Solar doesn't want to go through a hugely politicized, highly visible review of their loan, regardless of its merits. Republicans are investigating all loans for renewable energy made under a DOE program that ends this month and warning DOE to go slow on approval. Many of these projects, mostly big solar, are planned for California.

Nationwide solar panel installer SolarCity, which is based in San Mateo, also said it will not pursue a DOE loan to install solar on military family homes, citing increased paperwork resulting from the Solyndra bankruptcy (There is some good news for solar though. SolarCity will be installing solar panels on 60 more Walmart stores in California).

So, the DOE loan program hasn't quite expired yet and two companies whose business directly affects California have already balked on getting loans. Further, what looked doable a few months ago - extending the DOE program - now seems problematic. Thus, California's hyper-ambitious plan to have 33% renewable energy by 2020 will definitely be impacted as projects that were expected to get federal funds now probably won't.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read