Retired Attorney Takes Voting Rights Case All the Way to the Supreme Court -- By Himself

Supreme Court building.
Photo by Stephen Talas on Unsplash
Shawn GriffithsShawn Griffiths
Published: 09 Sep, 2025
5 min read

The next big voting rights case the Supreme Court of the United States could consider wasn’t filed by the ACLU, the League of Women Voters, Common Cause, or another household name when it comes to voter rights. 

The writ of certiorari for what could result in a landmark voting rights decision was litigated single-handedly all the way to SCOTUS by a retired attorney in Florida named Michael J. Polelle.

Polelle is challenging the constitutionality of Florida's closed primary election system, which bars over 3.4 million registered independent voters from participating in taxpayer-funded primaries – elections that have the most consequential impact on electoral outcomes.

"Unlike in authoritarian regimes, the right to a meaningful vote is a right of membership in the United States. This is called citizenship. It is not a right of membership in any particular political party," he said in remarks to IVN News.

He did not file the lawsuit at the behest of any group. He does not have any organization funding the litigation. And yet, he has taken his case for equal independent voting rights from Florida to District appellate court and now to the U.S. Supreme Court. 

In his case, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals acknowledged that closed primaries in Florida force independent voters to make a “hard choice” between forfeiting their vote and changing their party affiliation against their own beliefs. 

"Political parties are throwing a party alright...at taxpayers' expense. Independent thinkers are not invited," Polelle said.

He even got the Eleventh Circuit to admit that this partisan scheme subjects independent voters to “indignity” and that barring them from primary elections hinders their ability to participate equally in general elections.

But the Court wasn’t ready to rule that closed primaries were unconstitutional, citing a line of historical cases like Nader. Importantly, the cases cited have all answered a question of whether an independent voter can vote in a political party’s primary. 

IVP Donate

Polelle is asking a more fundamental question: where independent voters can participate in the state’s primary elections process, altogether.

"The principal goal of a political party is to acquire power and maintain self-preservation. Occasionally this goal coincides with the public interest," he said. 

The Appellate Court held that the violation of Polelle’s rights were “minimal,” claiming that voters can “simply” join a party and then re-register and become independent again after the primary.

Now, Polelle has petitioned his case to the highest court in the land, and this effort has not gone unnoticed. On Monday, the Independent Voter Project, Open Primaries, and the Forward Party filed a joint Amici brief to the Supreme Court in support of Polelle’s lawsuit.

In the Amici, participants argue that under the Supreme Court’s own precedent in Harper v. Virginia State Board. of Elections, the degree of infringement on a citizen’s fundamental right as a condition of voting is irrelevant. 

“Forcing an independent voter to join a private political organization whose platform and values they do not share as a condition of voting at an integral stage of the election process is itself a severe burden, even if the voter is permitted to later change their party registration,” they argue.

“The right to vote is fundamental, and the right not to associate is equally protected. Conditioning one on surrendering the other is constitutionally impermissible,” the brief further states, asserting that the reasoning of the lower court “turned the First Amendment on its head.” 

The appellate court also suggested that voters can simply “convince [their] representatives or [their] fellow Floridians of the State’s error,” ignoring a system in which candidates know the most consequential vote to their re-election is in the primary.

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

“But Floridians have already expressed their indignation with forced political association. In 2020, Florida voters considered Amendment 3, which would have replaced the closed primary with a nonpartisan, top-two primary for state offices,” the Amici states.

A significant majority of Floridians, 57% of the electorate, voted in favor of a nonpartisan primary. That is a higher percentage than either major party’s Presidential candidate received that election year. The measure failed only because Florida imposes a uniquely high 60% supermajority requirement for constitutional amendment.” 

Polelle’s lawsuit joins a legal fight that now spans more than a decade.

In 2014, the Independent Voter Project challenged the constitutionality of New Jersey’s closed primary system, as well as California’s unconstitutional use of semi-closed primaries in presidential elections.

IVP has already petitioned the Supreme Court to hear both of these cases:

Both petitions present the same core question as this case: whether the right to vote and to meaningful representation in publicly funded elections derives from citizenship or from compelled association with a political party.”

This year, Open Primaries filed a lawsuit in Maryland and has supported legal efforts against closed primaries in Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming, which reflect “a nationwide movement of litigation aimed at ending the exclusion of independent voters from decisive elections.”

“The American electorate is rapidly changing, and independents are now the largest group of voters in the country. It’s time for courts to begin to define their rights to freedom of speech and association. Mr. Polelle’s case, and our brief in support, ask the Supreme Court to do just that. We are taking the case of independent voter rights to court across the country. This is just the beginning.”

More Choice for San Diego

“When it comes to primary elections, the courts have focused exclusively on the rights of parties. But what about the rights of voters? These are OUR elections,” said Jeremy Gruber, senior vice president of Open Primaries. 

Many of these cases have had more than a single plaintiff and some of them have had significant backing, like the lawsuit out of Pennsylvania where CNN anchor Michael Smerconish is one of the plaintiffs. 

But in Florida, it is just one man asking a simple question that the Supreme Court has never answered directly: Does the right to vote at an integral stage of a publicly funded election derive from citizenship, or from membership in a political party?

You Might Also Like

Isn't It Weird That Congress Feels No Urgency to Re-Open the Government?
Isn't It Weird That Congress Feels No Urgency to Re-Open the Government?
The U.S. has entered Day 22 of the latest government shutdown with no end in sight. As pundits expect it to surpass the 35-day record set during Trump’s first term, a new Gallup poll shows voters’ approval of Congress has plummeted in the last month. Yet, for congressional leaders, there isn’t any urgency to re-open the government. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries trade jabs back and forth in the media, but the blame game continues to be prioritized over solutions....
22 Oct, 2025
-
5 min read
Partisan chess game.
The Gerrymandering Fight is About Democracy -- But Not for the Reasons You Think
The Texas GOP made two significant moves in the last few months to enhance their chances in the 2026 midterms. The first made national headlines and provoked a Democratic Party response. The second has flown under the radar....
20 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read
Joe Manchin
Joe Manchin on Taxpayer-Funded Primaries: 'They're Locking Us Out!'
While appearing on CNN host Michael Smerconish’s show, former Democratic U.S. Senator Joe Manchin, now a registered independent, told Smerconish that “we have to have open primaries” in order to get candidates who prioritize representation to run and have a chance to win....
17 Oct, 2025
-
2 min read
broken california map
EXCLUSIVE: California Commissioner Says Lawmakers Gutted Their Funding BEFORE Prop 50
The fate of California’s independently drawn congressional districts will be decided on November 4, when voters weigh in on a legislative gerrymander and the suspension of congressional maps from the state's independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC) under Proposition 50....
08 Oct, 2025
-
8 min read
fl-let-us-vote
Poll Shows Overwhelming Support for Opening Florida’s Primaries to 3.4M Independent Voters
A new statewide poll finds near-unanimous agreement among both Democratic and independent voters that Florida’s primaries should be opened to the state’s 3.4 million “No Party Affiliation” (NPA) voters who are currently shut out of taxpayer-funded elections....
10 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read