OPINION: Maine GOP's Hypocrisy on Ranked Choice Voting

image
Published: 29 Jul, 2020
Updated: 14 Aug, 2022
1 min read

Consider this voting method:

“If, on the first ballot, no one candidate receives a majority of the votes cast, the candidate receiving the least number of votes shall be eliminated…balloting shall continue in this manner until one candidate receives a majority vote.”

If this sounds like ranked-choice voting (RCV) to you, go to the head of the class. But this language is actually from The Rules of the Maine Republican Party. It’s how they elect their own officers.

That’s why it’s odd that the Maine GOP is trying to reject RCV—a voting method so similar to what they themselves use. But it’s true. And to do so, they have spent upwards of $400,000 on out-of-state signature collectors (asking Mainers to sign in person during a pandemic).

All of this appears to be for the benefit of the one electoral vote for president that Maine’s 2nd District might deliver for them if a less-than-50% vote can carry the day. Yes, despite the fact that Mainers have twice voted for RCV, Republican bosses want to overturn the voters’ will for one electoral vote.    

The GOP claims to have the required signatures. Maine’s Secretary of State has ruled otherwise, but the GOP has appealed. If they are successful in court, Mainers will vote for a third time on RCV. If that happens, Mainers should reject the GOP’s hypocritical and self-serving attempts to take us back to a lesser-of-two-evils system that is fraught with vote-splitting and the spoiler effect. 

RCV is a better way, and even the Maine GOP knows it.

Latest articles

A man filling out his election ballot.
Oregon Activist Sues over Closed Primaries: 'I Shouldn't Have to Join a Party to Have a Voice'
A new lawsuit filed in Oregon challenges the constitutionality of the state’s closed primary system, which denies the state’s largest registered voting bloc – independent voters – access to taxpayer-funded primary elections. The suit alleges Oregon is denying the voters equal voting rights...
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Supreme Court building.
Supreme Court Sides with Federal Corrections Officers in Lawsuit Over Prison Incident
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled June 30 that federal prison officers and officials cannot be sued by an inmate who accused them of excessive force during a 2021 incident, delivering a victory for federal corrections personnel concerned about rising legal exposure for doing their jobs....
01 Jul, 2025
-
3 min read
Marijuana plant.
Why the War on Cannabis Refuses to Die: How Boomers and the Yippies Made Weed Political
For much of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, American physicians freely prescribed cannabis to treat a wide range of ailments. But by the mid-twentieth century, federal officials were laying the groundwork for a sweeping criminal crackdown. Cannabis would ultimately be classified as a Schedule I substance, placed alongside heroin and LSD, and transformed into a political weapon that shaped American policy for the next six decades....
30 Jun, 2025
-
2 min read