Read More
Opinion

OPINION: Maine GOP's Hypocrisy on Ranked Choice Voting

Consider this voting method:

“If, on the first ballot, no one candidate receives a majority of the votes cast, the candidate receiving the least number of votes shall be eliminated…balloting shall continue in this manner until one candidate receives a majority vote.”

If this sounds like ranked-choice voting (RCV) to you, go to the head of the class. But this language is actually from The Rules of the Maine Republican Party. It’s how they elect their own officers.

That’s why it’s odd that the Maine GOP is trying to reject RCV—a voting method so similar to what they themselves use. But it’s true. And to do so, they have spent upwards of $400,000 on out-of-state signature collectors (asking Mainers to sign in person during a pandemic).

All of this appears to be for the benefit of the one electoral vote for president that Maine’s 2nd District might deliver for them if a less-than-50% vote can carry the day. Yes, despite the fact that Mainers have twice voted for RCV, Republican bosses want to overturn the voters’ will for one electoral vote.    

The GOP claims to have the required signatures. Maine’s Secretary of State has ruled otherwise, but the GOP has appealed. If they are successful in court, Mainers will vote for a third time on RCV. If that happens, Mainers should reject the GOP’s hypocritical and self-serving attempts to take us back to a lesser-of-two-evils system that is fraught with vote-splitting and the spoiler effect. 

RCV is a better way, and even the Maine GOP knows it.

What is this story missing? Let us know. >>What is this story missing? Let us know. >>

About the Author

John E. Palmer

John is an advocate for ending the two party duopoly. He supports election reform like ranked choice voting and a top 5 nonpartisan primary with RCV.

FacebookInstagramTwitterEmailEmail
Comments
Auto Pager Link