Skip to content
Subscribe

Poll: Independents Prefer Divided Government in Washington

Published:

Photo: washingtontimes.com

According to a new Gallup poll Thursday, independents prefer divided government in Washington, with the president belonging to a different party than the one that controls Congress.

The poll shouldn't be interpreted as a desire for partisan gridlock, which independent voters, along with voters in both of the nation's two largest political parties, overwhelmingly oppose, and which has left voters across the spectrum increasingly frustrated.

In fact, as noted last month by Bianca Ciotti at IVN, an overwhelming 90% of voters, in a recent poll result that held consistently high across the spectrum of affiliations, considered partisan gridlock the number one cause of Washington lawmakers' inability to solve problems.

The most recent Gallup poll on divided government did reveal a marked increase among Democrats, Republicans, and independents in support of one-party government over divided government. Gallup concluded:

"This suggests many Americans are experiencing divided-government fatigue."

In 2011, 35% of Democrats, 35% of Republicans, and 21% of independents supported same-party control over the White House and Congress.

Last week's poll saw the most dramatic surge in support of same-party government and a record high preference for it over divided government, with 49% of Democrats, 36% of Republicans, and 28% of independents supporting same-party control over the executive and legislative branches of the federal government.

But even with a seven point jump among independent voters, independents still significantly lag behind voters in either of the two largest parties when it comes to preferring same-party control, just as they did in 2011.

This is an interesting phenomenon. While independents are known for criticizing a lack of bipartisanship and willingness among lawmakers to cross party lines to find working solutions to problems with government, it also seems that independents prefer divided government in Washington, with the caveat that it is a cooperative, bipartisan divided government.

Because they are unaffiliated with either of the two largest political parties in Washington, it's not hard to see why independents see divided government as a hedge against either party becoming too powerful or swinging public policy too far in its direction. If that was something an independent voter saw as good for policy, depending on the party, the voter would likely be a member of that party instead of unaffiliated.

However, while independents show a clear preference over Republicans and Democrats for divided government in Washington, all three voter affiliation groups agree: lawmakers need to set aside their distrust and antagonism for colleagues across the aisle and work toward solutions that matter to voters.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Poll: Independents Prefer Divided Government in Washington

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us