Skip to content
Subscribe

Partisanship is Dangerous For All

Published:

I witnessed an interesting exchange while watching the October 19 episode of Real Time with Bill Maher. It was between two conservative columnists, Boris Epshteyn and John Fund, and MSNBC contributor Goldie Taylor and really highlighted why partisanship is dangerous for all Americans. The commentators argued about which party had a worse record on voter registration fraud. Epstheyn made an argument for voter ID laws and Taylor made the case that such laws are a ploy by the GOP to disenfranchise minority voters.

Taylor also pointed out a recent report in which a firm supporting the GOP had been found dumping voter registration forms. John Fund countered by bringing up the ACORN voting scandal and asked Taylor if she was vocal about calling that out when it benefited the Democratic Party. Taylor responded by saying, “Absolutely not.” A brief argument ensued before Maher ended the back and forth so he could end the show with his customary New Rules bit.

This exchange highlights the damage that extreme partisanship can inflict on the national conscious. Forget about the merits of each argument, the discussion turned into an argument about whose voting crimes were worse. There was no argument to counter the accusations, but in defending their “side” they argued essentially that “regardless of what people on my side have done, it’s the people on your side that are the problem.”

It’s reasonable that people will defend their political views and the people and organizations that represent them, but blind loyalty is destructive. At the heart of it all, political parties are supposed to represent the ideals of the people who stand behind them. When defending the political party becomes more important than defending the ideals the party is supposed to represent, it’s the people that lose their voice.

While there is nothing wrong with supporting a political party that caters to a particular interest, voters shouldn't adjust their interests simply to side with a political party. Even if someone is inclined to identify as a Republican or a Democrat (or another party), they should be just as critical of the dirt in their own house as they are about the dirt across the street.

If people are never willing to question the politicians they appoint and support, then these politicians will never try to live up to a standard worthy of their trust and allegiance. In the end, the people give the politicians power because they elect them. If politicians aren't held to a standard of criticism, regardless of party affiliation, people undermine the power vested to them as voting citizens.

A political attitude that legitimizes tit-for-tat between parties leaves the joke on us.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Partisanship is Dangerous For All

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us