Skip to content
Subscribe

Partisan Divide on Farm Bill Creates Uncertain Future for Food Stamps

Published:

Source: redalertpolitics.com

the farm bill

they were "taking food out of the mouths of  own poor constituents."

When the House Republicans passed a farm bill earlier this month without including the food stamp funding that has traditionally gone along with such bills, Democratic lawmakers raised an outcry. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told the GOP

So, what will happen to food stamps -- now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) -- now?

A separate food stamp bill may be proposed later, according to House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank D. Lucas (R-Okla.). If that doesn't happen, SNAP basically stays the way it is right now.

However, that doesn't necessarily mean all is well. Families receiving food stamps are already slated to take a small monthly cut (estimated at around $25-$30 for a family of three) under current legislation, according to Shannon Spillane, director of communications for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Still, the main point to understand is that SNAP is not being done away with or cut by the Republican farm bill coup. The real danger might be if House Republicans actually do design a separate food stamp bill, Spillane explained.

"We think it is likely the GOP will come up with a SNAP-only bill designed to pass solely with Republican votes, which could contain much deeper cuts than the farm bill that passed the House agricultural committee earlier this year," she said, pointing out that the earlier bill -- which is not the same as the one the House just passed -- would have cut $20 billion from SNAP over 10 years.

So far, the concern seems to center around what Republican lawmakers might do, rather than what has actually been done. Representatives from the Urban Institute and from Feeding America declined to speculate on SNAP's future, underscoring the uncertainty of the current situation.

To complicate matters, President Obama has threatened to veto any farm bill that does not contain food stamp legislation.

Unless lawmakers find a way around this latest instance of partisan gridlock, it seems likely SNAP will remain mostly untouched for the time being. Until things are resolved, though, some Democratic lawmakers may continue to prey on the fears of those who need the program, in order to gain the support of the lower-income urban demographic.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Partisan Divide on Farm Bill Creates Uncertain Future for Food Stamps

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us